[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] docs/system/s390x: Add a chapter about s390x boot devices
|
From: |
Cornelia Huck |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] docs/system/s390x: Add a chapter about s390x boot devices |
|
Date: |
Mon, 10 Aug 2020 12:29:45 +0200 |
On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 12:20:53 +0200
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 8/10/20 12:18 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 17:05:07 +0200
> > Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Booting on s390x is a little bit different compared to other architectures.
> >> Let's add some information for people who are not yet used to this.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >> docs/system/s390x/bootdevices.rst | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> docs/system/target-s390x.rst | 1 +
> >> 2 files changed, 83 insertions(+)
> >> create mode 100644 docs/system/s390x/bootdevices.rst
> >>
> >> diff --git a/docs/system/s390x/bootdevices.rst
> >> b/docs/system/s390x/bootdevices.rst
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000000..68f0ffd450
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/docs/system/s390x/bootdevices.rst
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
> >> +Boot devices on s390x
> >> +=====================
> >> +
> >> +Booting with bootindex parameter
> >> +--------------------------------
> >> +
> >> +For classical mainframe guests (i.e. LPAR or z/VM installations), you
> >> always
> >> +have to exactly specify the disk where you want to boot from (or "IPL"
> >> from,
> >
> > s/exactly/explictly/ ?
>
> Or "to explicit the disk ..."?
Hm, not sure what that means?