[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH 0/3] virtio: restore elem->in/out_sg after iov_discard_front/back
From: |
Stefan Hajnoczi |
Subject: |
[PATCH 0/3] virtio: restore elem->in/out_sg after iov_discard_front/back() |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:49:15 +0100 |
Both virtio-blk and virtio-crypto use destructive iov_discard_front/back()
operations on elem->in/out_sg. virtqueue_push() calls dma_memory_unmap() on t=
he
modified iovec arrays. The memory addresses may not match those originally
mapped with dma_memory_map().
This raises several issues:
1. MemoryRegion references can be leaked.
2. Dirty memory may not be tracked.
3. The non-RAM bounce buffer can be leaked.
This patch series solves the issue in two ways:
1. virtio-blk uses a new iov_discard_undo() API to restore iovec arrays.
2. virtio-crypto uses g_memdup() to avoid modifying the original iovec arrays.
The g_memdup() approach is slower than iov_discard_undo() but less
complex/fragile. I am less familiar with the virtio-crypto code and it uses
more complex sequences of iov_discard_front/back() calls than virtio-blk. If
anyone feels like optimizing virtio-crypto, please go ahead.
The virtio-blk bug was found by Alexander Bulekov's fuzzing effort. I found t=
he
virtio-crypto bug through code inspection.
Stefan Hajnoczi (3):
util/iov: add iov_discard_undo()
virtio-blk: undo destructive iov_discard_*() operations
virtio-crypto: don't modify elem->in/out_sg
include/hw/virtio/virtio-blk.h | 2 +
include/qemu/iov.h | 23 +++++
hw/block/virtio-blk.c | 9 +-
hw/virtio/virtio-crypto.c | 17 +++-
tests/test-iov.c | 165 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
util/iov.c | 50 +++++++++-
6 files changed, 257 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--=20
2.26.2
- [PATCH 0/3] virtio: restore elem->in/out_sg after iov_discard_front/back(),
Stefan Hajnoczi <=