[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH RFC 08/10] disas/: fix some comment spelling errors
From: |
zhaolichang |
Subject: |
[PATCH RFC 08/10] disas/: fix some comment spelling errors |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Aug 2020 18:14:58 +0800 |
I found that there are many spelling errors in the comments of qemu,
so I used the spellcheck tool to check the spelling errors
and finally found some spelling errors in the disas folder.
Signed-off-by: zhaolichang <zhaolichang@huawei.com>
---
disas/hppa.c | 2 +-
disas/libvixl/vixl/a64/constants-a64.h | 2 +-
disas/libvixl/vixl/a64/decoder-a64.h | 2 +-
disas/libvixl/vixl/a64/instructions-a64.h | 2 +-
disas/libvixl/vixl/globals.h | 2 +-
disas/m68k.c | 8 ++++----
disas/ppc.c | 2 +-
7 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/disas/hppa.c b/disas/hppa.c
index 2dbd1fc..dcf9a47 100644
--- a/disas/hppa.c
+++ b/disas/hppa.c
@@ -2021,7 +2021,7 @@ print_insn_hppa (bfd_vma memaddr, disassemble_info *info)
fput_fp_reg (GET_FIELD (insn, 6, 10), info);
break;
- /* 'fA' will not generate a space before the regsiter
+ /* 'fA' will not generate a space before the register
name. Normally that is fine. Except that it
causes problems with xmpyu which has no FP format
completer. */
diff --git a/disas/libvixl/vixl/a64/constants-a64.h
b/disas/libvixl/vixl/a64/constants-a64.h
index 2caa73a..88af5fe 100644
--- a/disas/libvixl/vixl/a64/constants-a64.h
+++ b/disas/libvixl/vixl/a64/constants-a64.h
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ V_(ImmDPShift, 15, 10, Bits)
\
V_(ImmAddSub, 21, 10, Bits)
\
V_(ShiftAddSub, 23, 22, Bits)
\
\
-/* Add/substract extend */
\
+/* Add/subtract extend */
\
V_(ImmExtendShift, 12, 10, Bits)
\
V_(ExtendMode, 15, 13, Bits)
\
\
diff --git a/disas/libvixl/vixl/a64/decoder-a64.h
b/disas/libvixl/vixl/a64/decoder-a64.h
index b3f04f6..045e2a7 100644
--- a/disas/libvixl/vixl/a64/decoder-a64.h
+++ b/disas/libvixl/vixl/a64/decoder-a64.h
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ class Decoder {
// On entry, instruction bits 27:24 = 0x0.
void DecodePCRelAddressing(const Instruction* instr);
- // Decode the add/subtract immediate instruction, and call the correspoding
+ // Decode the add/subtract immediate instruction, and call the corresponding
// visitors.
// On entry, instruction bits 27:24 = 0x1.
void DecodeAddSubImmediate(const Instruction* instr);
diff --git a/disas/libvixl/vixl/a64/instructions-a64.h
b/disas/libvixl/vixl/a64/instructions-a64.h
index 7e0dbae..0496a15 100644
--- a/disas/libvixl/vixl/a64/instructions-a64.h
+++ b/disas/libvixl/vixl/a64/instructions-a64.h
@@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ class NEONFormatDecoder {
};
// Construct a format decoder with increasingly specific format maps for each
- // subsitution. If no format map is specified, the default is the integer
+ // substitution. If no format map is specified, the default is the integer
// format map.
explicit NEONFormatDecoder(const Instruction* instr) {
instrbits_ = instr->InstructionBits();
diff --git a/disas/libvixl/vixl/globals.h b/disas/libvixl/vixl/globals.h
index 61dc9f7..9ae6f7a 100644
--- a/disas/libvixl/vixl/globals.h
+++ b/disas/libvixl/vixl/globals.h
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ const int MBytes = 1024 * KBytes;
#endif
// This is not as powerful as template based assertions, but it is simple.
// It assumes that the descriptions are unique. If this starts being a problem,
-// we can switch to a different implemention.
+// we can switch to a different implementation.
#define VIXL_CONCAT(a, b) a##b
#define VIXL_STATIC_ASSERT_LINE(line, condition) \
typedef char VIXL_CONCAT(STATIC_ASSERT_LINE_, line)[(condition) ? 1 : -1] \
diff --git a/disas/m68k.c b/disas/m68k.c
index 863409c..aefaecf 100644
--- a/disas/m68k.c
+++ b/disas/m68k.c
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ struct floatformat
unsigned int exp_start;
unsigned int exp_len;
/* Bias added to a "true" exponent to form the biased exponent. It
- is intentionally signed as, otherwize, -exp_bias can turn into a
+ is intentionally signed as, otherwise, -exp_bias can turn into a
very large number (e.g., given the exp_bias of 0x3fff and a 64
bit long, the equation (long)(1 - exp_bias) evaluates to
4294950914) instead of -16382). */
@@ -479,7 +479,7 @@ struct m68k_opcode_alias
and remaining 3 bits of register shifted 9 bits in first word.
Indicate upper/lower in 1 bit shifted 7 bits in second word.
Use with `R' or `u' format.
- n `m' withouth upper/lower indication. (For M[S]ACx; 4 bits split
+ n `m' without upper/lower indication. (For M[S]ACx; 4 bits split
with MSB shifted 6 bits in first word and remaining 3 bits of
register shifted 9 bits in first word. No upper/lower
indication is done.) Use with `R' or `u' format.
@@ -854,7 +854,7 @@ fetch_arg (unsigned char *buffer,
/* Check if an EA is valid for a particular code. This is required
for the EMAC instructions since the type of source address determines
- if it is a EMAC-load instruciton if the EA is mode 2-5, otherwise it
+ if it is a EMAC-load instruction if the EA is mode 2-5, otherwise it
is a non-load EMAC instruction and the bits mean register Ry.
A similar case exists for the movem instructions where the register
mask is interpreted differently for different EAs. */
@@ -1080,7 +1080,7 @@ print_indexed (int basereg,
/* Returns number of bytes "eaten" by the operand, or
return -1 if an invalid operand was found, or -2 if
- an opcode tabe error was found.
+ an opcode table error was found.
ADDR is the pc for this arg to be relative to. */
static int
diff --git a/disas/ppc.c b/disas/ppc.c
index 63e97cf..02be878 100644
--- a/disas/ppc.c
+++ b/disas/ppc.c
@@ -5226,7 +5226,7 @@ operand_value_powerpc (const struct powerpc_operand
*operand,
if ((operand->flags & PPC_OPERAND_SIGNED) != 0)
{
/* BITM is always some number of zeros followed by some
- number of ones, followed by some numer of zeros. */
+ number of ones, followed by some number of zeros. */
unsigned long top = operand->bitm;
/* top & -top gives the rightmost 1 bit, so this
fills in any trailing zeros. */
--
2.26.2.windows.1
- Re: [PATCH RFC 03/10] docs/: fix some comment spelling errors, (continued)
- [PATCH RFC 10/10] contrib/: fix some comment spelling errors, zhaolichang, 2020/08/12
- [PATCH RFC 09/10] qapi/: fix some comment spelling errors, zhaolichang, 2020/08/12
- [PATCH RFC 01/10] qemu/: fix some comment spelling errors, zhaolichang, 2020/08/12
- [PATCH RFC 02/10] migration/: fix some comment spelling errors, zhaolichang, 2020/08/12
- [PATCH RFC 08/10] disas/: fix some comment spelling errors,
zhaolichang <=
- Re: [PATCH RFC 00/10] fix some comment spelling errors, Markus Armbruster, 2020/08/24