[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v7 13/13] tests/acceptance: console boot tests for quanta-gsj
From: |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v7 13/13] tests/acceptance: console boot tests for quanta-gsj |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Aug 2020 07:29:15 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 |
+Eric / Richard for compiler optimizations.
On 8/20/20 3:53 AM, Havard Skinnemoen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 8:26 PM Havard Skinnemoen
> <hskinnemoen@google.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:48 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
>> wrote:
>>> INTERRUPTED: Test interrupted by SIGTERM
>>> Runner error occurred: Timeout reached
>>> (240.45 s)
>>>
>>> Is that expected?
>>
>> I'm not sure why it only happens when running direct kernel boot with
>> unoptimized qemu, but it seems a little happier if I enable a few more
>> peripherals that I have queued up (sd, ehci, ohci and rng), though not
>> enough.
>>
>> It still stalls for an awfully long time on "console: Run /init as
>> init process" though. I'm not sure what it's doing there. With -O2 it
>> only takes a couple of seconds to move on.
>
> So it turns out that the kernel gets _really_ sluggish when skipping
> the clock initialization normally done by the boot loader.
>
> I changed the reset value of CLKSEL like this:
>
> diff --git a/hw/misc/npcm7xx_clk.c b/hw/misc/npcm7xx_clk.c
> index 21ab4200d1..5e9849410f 100644
> --- a/hw/misc/npcm7xx_clk.c
> +++ b/hw/misc/npcm7xx_clk.c
> @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ enum NPCM7xxCLKRegisters {
> */
> static const uint32_t cold_reset_values[NPCM7XX_CLK_NR_REGS] = {
> [NPCM7XX_CLK_CLKEN1] = 0xffffffff,
> - [NPCM7XX_CLK_CLKSEL] = 0x004aaaaa,
> + [NPCM7XX_CLK_CLKSEL] = 0x004aaba9,
> [NPCM7XX_CLK_CLKDIV1] = 0x5413f855,
> [NPCM7XX_CLK_PLLCON0] = 0x00222101 | PLLCON_LOKI,
> [NPCM7XX_CLK_PLLCON1] = 0x00202101 | PLLCON_LOKI,
>
> which switches the CPU core and UART to run from PLL2 instead of
> CLKREF (25 MHz).
>
> With this change, the test passes without optimization:
>
> (02/19)
> tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_quanta_gsj_initrd:
> PASS (39.62 s)
>
> It doesn't look like this change hurts booting from the bootrom (IIUC
> the nuvoton bootblock overwrites CLKSEL anyway), but it's not super
> clean.
>
> Perhaps I should make it conditional on kernel_filename being set? Or
> would it be better to provide a write_board_setup hook for this?
QEMU prefers to avoid ifdef'ry at all cost. However I find this
approach acceptable (anyway up to the maintainer):
+static void npcm7xx_clk_cold_reset_fixup(NPCM7xxCLKState *s)
+{
+#ifndef __OPTIMIZE__
+ /*
+ * When built without optimization, ...
+ * so run CPU core and UART from PLL2 instead of CLKREF.
+ */
+ s->regs[NPCM7XX_CLK_CLKSEL] |= 0x103,
+#endif
+}
static void npcm7xx_clk_enter_reset(Object *obj, ResetType type)
{
NPCM7xxCLKState *s = NPCM7XX_CLK(obj);
QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(s->regs) != sizeof(cold_reset_values));
switch (type) {
case RESET_TYPE_COLD:
memcpy(s->regs, cold_reset_values, sizeof(cold_reset_values));
+ npcm7xx_clk_cold_reset_fixup(s);
s->ref_ns = qemu_clock_get_ns(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL);
return;
}
...
Regards,
Phil.
- [PATCH v7 05/13] hw/arm: Add two NPCM7xx-based machines, (continued)
- [PATCH v7 05/13] hw/arm: Add two NPCM7xx-based machines, Havard Skinnemoen, 2020/08/10
- [PATCH v7 08/13] hw/nvram: NPCM7xx OTP device model, Havard Skinnemoen, 2020/08/10
- [PATCH v7 09/13] hw/mem: Stubbed out NPCM7xx Memory Controller model, Havard Skinnemoen, 2020/08/10
- [PATCH v7 11/13] hw/arm: Wire up BMC boot flash for npcm750-evb and quanta-gsj, Havard Skinnemoen, 2020/08/10
- [PATCH v7 10/13] hw/ssi: NPCM7xx Flash Interface Unit device model, Havard Skinnemoen, 2020/08/10
- [PATCH v7 12/13] docs/system: Add Nuvoton machine documentation, Havard Skinnemoen, 2020/08/10
- [PATCH v7 13/13] tests/acceptance: console boot tests for quanta-gsj, Havard Skinnemoen, 2020/08/10
- Re: [PATCH v7 13/13] tests/acceptance: console boot tests for quanta-gsj, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/08/11
- Re: [PATCH v7 13/13] tests/acceptance: console boot tests for quanta-gsj, Havard Skinnemoen, 2020/08/11
- Re: [PATCH v7 13/13] tests/acceptance: console boot tests for quanta-gsj, Havard Skinnemoen, 2020/08/19
- Re: [PATCH v7 13/13] tests/acceptance: console boot tests for quanta-gsj,
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <=
- Re: [PATCH v7 13/13] tests/acceptance: console boot tests for quanta-gsj, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/08/20
- Re: [PATCH v7 13/13] tests/acceptance: console boot tests for quanta-gsj, Havard Skinnemoen, 2020/08/20
- Re: [PATCH v7 13/13] tests/acceptance: console boot tests for quanta-gsj, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/08/20
- Re: [PATCH v7 13/13] tests/acceptance: console boot tests for quanta-gsj, Havard Skinnemoen, 2020/08/20
- Re: [PATCH v7 13/13] tests/acceptance: console boot tests for quanta-gsj, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/08/22