[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: deprecation of in-tree builds
From: |
Michael Tokarev |
Subject: |
Re: deprecation of in-tree builds |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Aug 2020 14:14:36 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 |
20.08.2020 13:54, Kevin Wolf wrote:
[]
>> My current plan is to land the Meson series first, because it is
>> really painful for Paolo to try to keep rebasing it as other
>> changes to the old build system occur. This would break
>> in-tree builds temporarily until the "automatic creation and
>> use of a builddir" patches go in on top of it.
>
> Usually, our requirement is that patch series don't break anything. And
> if something slips through, whoever broke it is supposed to fix it, not
> whoever is affected.
In this case it isn't really broken per se - there's a simple
workaround (build in a subdir). This rule exist to keep the
bisectability, and this one is trivial by invoking this very
workaround.
/mjt
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds, Peter Maydell, 2020/08/18
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds, Kevin Wolf, 2020/08/20
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds,
Michael Tokarev <=
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds, Paolo Bonzini, 2020/08/20
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds, Peter Maydell, 2020/08/20
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds, Kevin Wolf, 2020/08/20
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds, Peter Maydell, 2020/08/20
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds, Paolo Bonzini, 2020/08/20
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds, Kevin Wolf, 2020/08/20
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds, Paolo Bonzini, 2020/08/20
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds, Gerd Hoffmann, 2020/08/21
Re: deprecation of in-tree builds, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2020/08/20