[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug 757702] Re: ARM: singlestepping insn which UNDEFs should stop at UN
From: |
Thomas Huth |
Subject: |
[Bug 757702] Re: ARM: singlestepping insn which UNDEFs should stop at UNDEF vector insn, not after it |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Aug 2020 14:59:27 -0000 |
Fix has been included here:
https://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commitdiff;h=ba3c35d9c4026361fd3
** Changed in: qemu
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu-
devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/757702
Title:
ARM: singlestepping insn which UNDEFs should stop at UNDEF vector
insn, not after it
Status in QEMU:
Fix Released
Bug description:
ARMv7a has lot of undefined instruction from its instruction opcode
space. This undefined instructions are very useful for replacing
sensitive non-priviledged instructions of guest operating systems
(virtualization). The undefined instruction exception executes at
<exception_base> + 0x4, where <exception_base> can be 0x0 or
0xfff00000. Currently, in qemu 0.14.0 undefined instruction fault at
0x8 offset instead of 0x4. This was not a problem with qemu 0.13.0,
seems like this is a new bug. As as example, if we try to execute
value "0xec019800" in qemu 0.14.0 then it should cause undefined
exception at <exception_base>+0x4 since "0xec019800" is an undefined
instruction.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/757702/+subscriptions
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Bug 757702] Re: ARM: singlestepping insn which UNDEFs should stop at UNDEF vector insn, not after it,
Thomas Huth <=