[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] migration/dirtyrate: Record hash results for each s
From: |
Dr. David Alan Gilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] migration/dirtyrate: Record hash results for each sampled page |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Aug 2020 18:30:09 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.14.6 (2020-07-11) |
* Chuan Zheng (zhengchuan@huawei.com) wrote:
> Record hash results for each sampled page.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuan Zheng <zhengchuan@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: YanYing Zhuang <ann.zhuangyanying@huawei.com>
> ---
> migration/dirtyrate.c | 144
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> migration/dirtyrate.h | 7 +++
> 2 files changed, 151 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/migration/dirtyrate.c b/migration/dirtyrate.c
> index c4304ef..62b6f69 100644
> --- a/migration/dirtyrate.c
> +++ b/migration/dirtyrate.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> #include "dirtyrate.h"
>
> CalculatingDirtyRateState CalculatingState = CAL_DIRTY_RATE_INIT;
> +static unsigned long int qcrypto_hash_len = QCRYPTO_HASH_LEN;
Why do we need this static rather than just using the QCRYPTO_HASH_LEN ?
It's never going to change is it?
(and anyway it's just a MD5 len?)
> static struct DirtyRateStat dirty_stat;
>
> static int dirty_rate_set_state(int new_state)
> @@ -71,6 +72,149 @@ static void update_dirtyrate(uint64_t msec)
> dirty_stat.dirty_rate = dirty_rate;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * get hash result for the sampled memory with length of 4K byte in ramblock,
> + * which starts from ramblock base address.
> + */
> +static int get_ramblock_vfn_hash(struct RamblockDirtyInfo *info,
> + unsigned long vfn, uint8_t **md)
> +{
> + struct iovec iov_array;
> + int ret = 0;
> + int nkey = 1;
> + size_t hash_len = qcrypto_hash_len;
> +
> + iov_array.iov_base = info->ramblock_addr +
> + vfn * DIRTYRATE_SAMPLE_PAGE_SIZE;
> + iov_array.iov_len = DIRTYRATE_SAMPLE_PAGE_SIZE;
> +
> + if (qcrypto_hash_bytesv(QCRYPTO_HASH_ALG_MD5,
> + &iov_array, nkey,
> + md, &hash_len, NULL) < 0) {
> + ret = -1;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int save_ramblock_hash(struct RamblockDirtyInfo *info)
> +{
> + unsigned int sample_pages_count;
> + uint8_t *md = NULL;
> + int i;
> + int ret = -1;
> + GRand *rand = g_rand_new();
> +
> + sample_pages_count = info->sample_pages_count;
> +
> + /* ramblock size less than one page, return success to skip this
> ramblock */
> + if (unlikely(info->ramblock_pages == 0 || sample_pages_count == 0)) {
> + ret = 0;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + info->hash_result = g_try_malloc0_n(sample_pages_count,
> + sizeof(uint8_t) * qcrypto_hash_len);
> + if (!info->hash_result) {
> + ret = -1;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + info->sample_page_vfn = g_try_malloc0_n(sample_pages_count,
> + sizeof(unsigned long));
> + if (!info->sample_page_vfn) {
> + g_free(info->hash_result);
> + ret = -1;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < sample_pages_count; i++) {
> + md = info->hash_result + i * qcrypto_hash_len;
> + info->sample_page_vfn[i] = g_rand_int_range(rand, 0,
> + info->ramblock_pages -
> 1);
> + ret = get_ramblock_vfn_hash(info, info->sample_page_vfn[i], &md);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + goto out;
> + }
> + }
> + ret = 0;
> +
> +out:
> + g_rand_free(rand);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void get_ramblock_dirty_info(RAMBlock *block,
> + struct RamblockDirtyInfo *info,
> + struct DirtyRateConfig *config)
> +{
> + uint64_t sample_pages_per_gigabytes = config->sample_pages_per_gigabytes;
> +
> + /* Right shift 30 bits to calc block size in GB */
> + info->sample_pages_count = (qemu_ram_get_used_length(block)
> + * sample_pages_per_gigabytes) >> 30;
> +
> + /* Right shift 12 bits to calc page count in 4KB */
> + info->ramblock_pages = qemu_ram_get_used_length(block) >> 12;
Is this really >> 12 ? Should it actually be
/ DIRTYRATE_SAMPLE_PAGE_SIZE ?
(and should you need that or just use TARGET_PAGE_SIZE?)
> + info->ramblock_addr = qemu_ram_get_host_addr(block);
> + strcpy(info->idstr, qemu_ram_get_idstr(block));
> +}
> +
> +static struct RamblockDirtyInfo *
> +alloc_ramblock_dirty_info(int *block_index,
> + struct RamblockDirtyInfo *block_dinfo)
> +{
> + struct RamblockDirtyInfo *info = NULL;
> + int index = *block_index;
> +
> + if (!block_dinfo) {
> + block_dinfo = g_try_new(struct RamblockDirtyInfo, 1);
> + index = 0;
> + } else {
> + index++;
> + block_dinfo = g_try_realloc(block_dinfo, (index + 1) *
> + sizeof(struct RamblockDirtyInfo));
> + }
> + if (!block_dinfo) {
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + info = &block_dinfo[index];
> + memset(info, 0, sizeof(struct RamblockDirtyInfo));
> +
> + *block_index = index;
> + return block_dinfo;
> +}
> +
> +static int record_ramblock_hash_info(struct RamblockDirtyInfo **block_dinfo,
> + struct DirtyRateConfig config,
> + int *block_index)
> +{
> + struct RamblockDirtyInfo *info = NULL;
> + struct RamblockDirtyInfo *dinfo = NULL;
> + RAMBlock *block = NULL;
> + int index = 0;
> +
> + RAMBLOCK_FOREACH_MIGRATABLE(block) {
> + dinfo = alloc_ramblock_dirty_info(&index, dinfo);
> + if (dinfo == NULL) {
> + return -1;
> + }
> + info = &dinfo[index];
> + get_ramblock_dirty_info(block, info, &config);
> + if (save_ramblock_hash(info) < 0) {
> + *block_dinfo = dinfo;
> + *block_index = index;
> + return -1;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + *block_dinfo = dinfo;
> + *block_index = index;
> +
> + return 0;
You should add some trace_ calls at various places to make this easier
to debug.
Dave
> +}
> +
> static void calculate_dirtyrate(struct DirtyRateConfig config)
> {
> /* todo */
> diff --git a/migration/dirtyrate.h b/migration/dirtyrate.h
> index af57c80..0812b16 100644
> --- a/migration/dirtyrate.h
> +++ b/migration/dirtyrate.h
> @@ -20,10 +20,17 @@
> #define DIRTYRATE_DEFAULT_SAMPLE_PAGES 256
>
> /*
> + * Sample page size 4K as default.
> + */
> +#define DIRTYRATE_SAMPLE_PAGE_SIZE 4096
> +
> +/*
> * Record ramblock idstr
> */
> #define RAMBLOCK_INFO_MAX_LEN 256
>
> +#define QCRYPTO_HASH_LEN 16
> +
> /* Take 1s as default for calculation duration */
> #define DEFAULT_FETCH_DIRTYRATE_TIME_SEC 1
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
- [PATCH v3 03/10] migration/dirtyrate: Add dirtyrate statistics series functions, (continued)
- [PATCH v3 05/10] migration/dirtyrate: Record hash results for each sampled page, Chuan Zheng, 2020/08/16
- Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] migration/dirtyrate: Record hash results for each sampled page,
Dr. David Alan Gilbert <=
- Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] migration/dirtyrate: Record hash results for each sampled page, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2020/08/20
- Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] migration/dirtyrate: Record hash results for each sampled page, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2020/08/20
- Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] migration/dirtyrate: Record hash results for each sampled page, Zheng Chuan, 2020/08/21
- Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] migration/dirtyrate: Record hash results for each sampled page, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2020/08/21
- Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] migration/dirtyrate: Record hash results for each sampled page, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2020/08/21
- Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] migration/dirtyrate: Record hash results for each sampled page, Zheng Chuan, 2020/08/21
- Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] migration/dirtyrate: Record hash results for each sampled page, Zheng Chuan, 2020/08/22
- Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] migration/dirtyrate: Record hash results for each sampled page, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2020/08/24
[PATCH v3 04/10] migration/dirtyrate: move RAMBLOCK_FOREACH_MIGRATABLE into ram.h, Chuan Zheng, 2020/08/16