Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] audio/jack: fix use after free segfault

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 21/08/20 13:28, Geoffrey McRae wrote:
> 
>> My suggestion is to work towards protecting the audio code with its own
>> mutex(es) and ignore the existence of the BQL for subsystems that can do
>> so (audio is a prime candidate).  Also please add comments to
>> audio_int.h about which functions are called from other threads than the
>> QEMU main thread.
> 
> Ok, so to get back on topic, what exactly is the best way forward to fix
> this issue in this patchset? Should I be managing a local mutex instead?

I think adding a local mutex for audio stuff would be best, if it's not
too hard.

Paolo