Re: [PULL 00/14] Linux user for 5.2 patches

[Laurent Vivier]

Filip,

could you have a look to see what's going wrong?

Thanks,
LAurent

Le 21/08/2020 à 18:23, Peter Maydell a écrit :
> On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 at 07:51, Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu> wrote:
>>
>> The following changes since commit d0ed6a69d399ae193959225cdeaa9382746c91cc:
>>
>>   Update version for v5.1.0 release (2020-08-11 17:07:03 +0100)
>>
>> are available in the Git repository at:
>>
>>   git://github.com/vivier/qemu.git tags/linux-user-for-5.2-pull-request
>>
>> for you to fetch changes up to 04275cad60c8f99e0dd7f56aecda68ceac926da8:
>>
>>   linux-user: Fix 'utimensat()' implementation (2020-08-12 10:09:58 +0200)
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Add btrfs ioctls
>> Add clock_getres_time64, timer_gettime64, timer_settime64,
>>     timerfd_gettime64, timerfd_settime64
>> Some fixes (page protection, print_fdset, timerspec, itimerspec)
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Fails to compile:
> 
> ../../linux-user/syscall_types.h:407:28: error:
> ‘BTRFS_INO_LOOKUP_USER_PATH_MAX’ undeclared here (not in a function);
> did you mean ‘BTRFS_INO_LOOKUP_PATH_MAX’?
>         MK_ARRAY(TYPE_CHAR, BTRFS_INO_LOOKUP_USER_PATH_MAX)) /* path */
>                             ^
> 
> ../../linux-user/syscall_types.h:451:17: error:
> ‘BTRFS_MAX_ROOTREF_BUFFER_NUM’ undeclared here (not in a function)
>                  BTRFS_MAX_ROOTREF_BUFFER_NUM), /* rootref */
>                  ^
> 
> On PPC, even more errors, relating to not having
> BTRFS_PATH_NAME_MAX, PTRFS_VOL_NAME_MAX, etc.
> 
> Not sure if this was a semantic conflict with the meson
> conversion, or just an assumption of a newer btrfs.h
> than some systems have.
> 
> thanks
> -- PMM
>