[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PULL 00/21] machine + QOM queue, 2020-10-05
|
From: |
Peter Maydell |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PULL 00/21] machine + QOM queue, 2020-10-05 |
|
Date: |
Tue, 6 Oct 2020 15:38:56 +0100 |
On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 15:36, Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 03:03:57PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > Compile failure on OSX:
> >
> > ../../hw/core/numa.c:429:20: error: format specifies type 'unsigned
> > char' but the argument has type 'int' [-Werror,-Wformat]
> > node->level - 1);
> > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > /Users/pm215/src/qemu-for-merges/include/qapi/error.h:319:35: note:
> > expanded from macro 'error_setg'
> > (fmt), ## __VA_ARGS__)
> > ~~~ ^~~~~~~~~~~
> > 1 error generated.
>
> Is there a CI system where this is tested? I'd like to be able
> to detect this kind of failure before sending pull requests.
Currently this is still my ad-hoc setup. I think there is
some CI that tests OSX compiles, though I have no idea how
individual maintainers set up to use it.
thanks
-- PMM
- [PULL 15/21] docs/devel/qom: Remove usage of <code>, (continued)
- [PULL 15/21] docs/devel/qom: Remove usage of <code>, Eduardo Habkost, 2020/10/05
- [PULL 17/21] kernel-doc: Handle function typedefs that return pointers, Eduardo Habkost, 2020/10/05
- [PULL 16/21] docs/devel/qom: Avoid long lines, Eduardo Habkost, 2020/10/05
- [PULL 20/21] memory: Explicitly tag doc comments for structs, Eduardo Habkost, 2020/10/05
- [PULL 18/21] kernel-doc: Handle function typedefs without asterisks, Eduardo Habkost, 2020/10/05
- [PULL 14/21] docs/devel/qom: Use *emphasis* for emphasis, Eduardo Habkost, 2020/10/05
- [PULL 21/21] kernel-doc: Remove $decl_type='type name' hack, Eduardo Habkost, 2020/10/05
- [PULL 19/21] qom: Explicitly tag doc comments for typedefs and structs, Eduardo Habkost, 2020/10/05
- Re: [PULL 00/21] machine + QOM queue, 2020-10-05, Peter Maydell, 2020/10/06
- Re: [PULL 00/21] machine + QOM queue, 2020-10-05, Eduardo Habkost, 2020/10/06
- Re: [PULL 00/21] machine + QOM queue, 2020-10-05,
Peter Maydell <=
- Re: [PULL 00/21] machine + QOM queue, 2020-10-05, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2020/10/06
- Re: [PULL 00/21] machine + QOM queue, 2020-10-05, Thomas Huth, 2020/10/06
- Re: [PULL 00/21] machine + QOM queue, 2020-10-05, Paolo Bonzini, 2020/10/06
- Re: [PULL 00/21] machine + QOM queue, 2020-10-05, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2020/10/07
- Re: [PULL 00/21] machine + QOM queue, 2020-10-05, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2020/10/07
- Re: [PULL 00/21] machine + QOM queue, 2020-10-05, Paolo Bonzini, 2020/10/06
- Re: [PULL 00/21] machine + QOM queue, 2020-10-05, Igor Mammedov, 2020/10/06
- Re: [PULL 00/21] machine + QOM queue, 2020-10-05, Igor Mammedov, 2020/10/06
- Re: [PULL 00/21] machine + QOM queue, 2020-10-05, Paolo Bonzini, 2020/10/06
- Re: [PULL 00/21] machine + QOM queue, 2020-10-05, Igor Mammedov, 2020/10/06