[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] hw/intc: Fix incorrect calculation of core in liointc_read()
|
From: |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] hw/intc: Fix incorrect calculation of core in liointc_read() and liointc_write() |
|
Date: |
Tue, 3 Nov 2020 15:26:20 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.3.1 |
On 11/3/20 3:05 PM, AlexChen wrote:
> On 2020/11/3 17:53, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
>>
>>
>> 閸︼拷 2020/11/3 17:32, AlexChen 閸愭瑩浜�:
>>> According to the loongson spec
>>> (http://www.loongson.cn/uploadfile/cpu/3B1500/Loongson_3B1500_cpu_user_1.pdf)
>>> and the macro definition(#define R_PERCORE_ISR(x) (0x40 + 0x8 * x)), we know
>>> that the ISR size of per CORE is 8, so here we need to divide
>>> (addr - R_PERCORE_ISR(0)) by 8, not 4.
>> Hi Alex
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> That was my fault.. Per Core ISA is rarely used by kernel..
No board in QEMU use this device. So we are safe =)
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>
>>> Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
>> Btw:
>> How can you discover this by robot?
>> Huawei owns real artifical intelligence technology lol :-閿涳拷
>>
>>
>
> Thanks for your review.
> EulerRobot is a virtualization software quality automation project that
> integrates some tools and test suites such as gcc/clang make test, qemu ut,
> qtest, coccinelle scripts and avocado-vt.
> The code checking tool found there was a potential array out of bounds at
> 'r = p->per_core_isr[core]', since 'core' may be 7 which is bigger than
> 'per_core_isr' array size 3.
> So we found this bug.
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
>> - Jiaxun
>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Chen <alex.chen@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>> hw/intc/loongson_liointc.c | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/intc/loongson_liointc.c b/hw/intc/loongson_liointc.c
>>> index 30fb375b72..fbbfb57ee9 100644
>>> --- a/hw/intc/loongson_liointc.c
>>> +++ b/hw/intc/loongson_liointc.c
>>> @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ liointc_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, unsigned int
>>> size)
>>>
>>> if (addr >= R_PERCORE_ISR(0) &&
>>> addr < R_PERCORE_ISR(NUM_CORES)) {
>>> - int core = (addr - R_PERCORE_ISR(0)) / 4;
>>> + int core = (addr - R_PERCORE_ISR(0)) / 8;
>>> r = p->per_core_isr[core];
>>> goto out;
>>> }
>>> @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ liointc_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
>>>
>>> if (addr >= R_PERCORE_ISR(0) &&
>>> addr < R_PERCORE_ISR(NUM_CORES)) {
>>> - int core = (addr - R_PERCORE_ISR(0)) / 4;
>>> + int core = (addr - R_PERCORE_ISR(0)) / 8;
>>> p->per_core_isr[core] = value;
>>> goto out;
>>> }
>> .
>>
>
>
Re: [PATCH] hw/intc: Fix incorrect calculation of core in liointc_read() and liointc_write(), Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/11/03