[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC PATCH 11/25] hw/pxb: Allow creation of a CXL PXB (host bridge)
|
From: |
Jonathan Cameron |
|
Subject: |
Re: [RFC PATCH 11/25] hw/pxb: Allow creation of a CXL PXB (host bridge) |
|
Date: |
Mon, 16 Nov 2020 16:44:09 +0000 |
On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 21:47:10 -0800
Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> wrote:
> This works like adding a typical pxb device, except the name is
> 'pxb-cxl' instead of 'pxb-pcie'. An example command line would be as
> follows:
> -device pxb-cxl,id=cxl.0,bus="pcie.0",bus_nr=1
>
> A CXL PXB is backward compatible with PCIe. What this means in practice
> is that an operating system that is unaware of CXL should still be able
> to enumerate this topology as if it were PCIe.
>
> One can create multiple CXL PXB host bridges, but a host bridge can only
> be connected to the main root bus. Host bridges cannot appear elsewhere
> in the topology.
>
> Note that as of this patch, the ACPI tables needed for the host bridge
> (specifically, an ACPI object in _SB named ACPI0016 and the CEDT) aren't
> created. So while this patch internally creates it, it cannot be
> properly used by an operating system or other system software.
>
> Upcoming patches will allow creating multiple host bridges.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Hi Ben,
Few minor things inline.
Jonathan
> ---
> hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> hw/pci/pci.c | 7 +++
> include/hw/pci/pci.h | 6 +++
> 3 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c
> b/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c
> index 88c45dc3b5..3a8d815231 100644
> --- a/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c
> +++ b/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c
> @@ -56,6 +56,10 @@ DECLARE_INSTANCE_CHECKER(PXBDev, PXB_DEV,
> DECLARE_INSTANCE_CHECKER(PXBDev, PXB_PCIE_DEV,
> TYPE_PXB_PCIE_DEVICE)
>
> +#define TYPE_PXB_CXL_DEVICE "pxb-cxl"
> +DECLARE_INSTANCE_CHECKER(PXBDev, PXB_CXL_DEV,
> + TYPE_PXB_CXL_DEVICE)
> +
> struct PXBDev {
> /*< private >*/
> PCIDevice parent_obj;
> @@ -67,6 +71,11 @@ struct PXBDev {
>
> static PXBDev *convert_to_pxb(PCIDevice *dev)
> {
> + /* A CXL PXB's parent bus is PCIe, so the normal check won't work */
> + if (object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(dev), TYPE_PXB_CXL_DEVICE)) {
> + return PXB_CXL_DEV(dev);
> + }
> +
> return pci_bus_is_express(pci_get_bus(dev))
> ? PXB_PCIE_DEV(dev) : PXB_DEV(dev);
> }
> @@ -111,11 +120,20 @@ static const TypeInfo pxb_pcie_bus_info = {
> .class_init = pxb_bus_class_init,
> };
>
> +static const TypeInfo pxb_cxl_bus_info = {
> + .name = TYPE_PXB_CXL_BUS,
> + .parent = TYPE_CXL_BUS,
> + .instance_size = sizeof(PXBBus),
> + .class_init = pxb_bus_class_init,
> +};
> +
> static const char *pxb_host_root_bus_path(PCIHostState *host_bridge,
> PCIBus *rootbus)
> {
> - PXBBus *bus = pci_bus_is_express(rootbus) ?
> - PXB_PCIE_BUS(rootbus) : PXB_BUS(rootbus);
> + PXBBus *bus = pci_bus_is_cxl(rootbus) ?
> + PXB_CXL_BUS(rootbus) :
> + pci_bus_is_express(rootbus) ? PXB_PCIE_BUS(rootbus) :
> + PXB_BUS(rootbus);
There comes a point where if / else is much more readable.
>
> snprintf(bus->bus_path, 8, "0000:%02x", pxb_bus_num(rootbus));
> return bus->bus_path;
> @@ -380,13 +398,58 @@ static const TypeInfo pxb_pcie_dev_info = {
> },
> };
>
> +static void pxb_cxl_dev_realize(PCIDevice *dev, Error **errp)
> +{
> + /* A CXL PXB's parent bus is still PCIe */
> + if (!pci_bus_is_express(pci_get_bus(dev))) {
> + error_setg(errp, "pxb-cxl devices cannot reside on a PCI bus");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + pxb_dev_realize_common(dev, CXL, errp);
> +}
> +
> +static void pxb_cxl_dev_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
> +{
> + DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
> + PCIDeviceClass *k = PCI_DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
> +
> + k->realize = pxb_cxl_dev_realize;
> + k->exit = pxb_dev_exitfn;
> + k->vendor_id = PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL;
> + k->device_id = 0xabcd;
Just to check, is that an officially assigned device_id that we will never
have a clash with? Nice ID to get if it is :)
> + k->class_id = PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_HOST;
> + k->subsystem_vendor_id = PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL;
> +
> + dc->desc = "CXL Host Bridge";
> + device_class_set_props(dc, pxb_dev_properties);
> + set_bit(DEVICE_CATEGORY_BRIDGE, dc->categories);
> +
> + /* Host bridges aren't hotpluggable. FIXME: spec reference */
> + dc->hotpluggable = false;
> +}
> +
> +static const TypeInfo pxb_cxl_dev_info = {
> + .name = TYPE_PXB_CXL_DEVICE,
> + .parent = TYPE_PCI_DEVICE,
> + .instance_size = sizeof(PXBDev),
> + .class_init = pxb_cxl_dev_class_init,
> + .interfaces =
> + (InterfaceInfo[]){
> + { INTERFACE_CONVENTIONAL_PCI_DEVICE },
> + {},
> + },
> +};
> +
> static void pxb_register_types(void)
> {
> type_register_static(&pxb_bus_info);
> type_register_static(&pxb_pcie_bus_info);
> + type_register_static(&pxb_cxl_bus_info);
> type_register_static(&pxb_host_info);
> type_register_static(&pxb_dev_info);
> type_register_static(&pxb_pcie_dev_info);
> + type_register_static(&pxb_cxl_dev_info);
> }
>
> type_init(pxb_register_types)
> diff --git a/hw/pci/pci.c b/hw/pci/pci.c
> index db88788c4b..67eed889a4 100644
> --- a/hw/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/hw/pci/pci.c
> @@ -220,6 +220,12 @@ static const TypeInfo pcie_bus_info = {
> .class_init = pcie_bus_class_init,
> };
>
> +static const TypeInfo cxl_bus_info = {
> + .name = TYPE_CXL_BUS,
> + .parent = TYPE_PCIE_BUS,
> + .class_init = pcie_bus_class_init,
> +};
> +
> static PCIBus *pci_find_bus_nr(PCIBus *bus, int bus_num);
> static void pci_update_mappings(PCIDevice *d);
> static void pci_irq_handler(void *opaque, int irq_num, int level);
> @@ -2847,6 +2853,7 @@ static void pci_register_types(void)
> {
> type_register_static(&pci_bus_info);
> type_register_static(&pcie_bus_info);
> + type_register_static(&cxl_bus_info);
> type_register_static(&conventional_pci_interface_info);
> type_register_static(&cxl_interface_info);
> type_register_static(&pcie_interface_info);
> diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pci.h b/include/hw/pci/pci.h
> index 4e6fd59fdd..52267ff69e 100644
> --- a/include/hw/pci/pci.h
> +++ b/include/hw/pci/pci.h
> @@ -405,6 +405,7 @@ typedef PCIINTxRoute (*pci_route_irq_fn)(void *opaque,
> int pin);
> #define TYPE_PCI_BUS "PCI"
> OBJECT_DECLARE_TYPE(PCIBus, PCIBusClass, PCI_BUS)
> #define TYPE_PCIE_BUS "PCIE"
> +#define TYPE_CXL_BUS "CXL"
>
> bool pci_bus_is_express(PCIBus *bus);
>
> @@ -753,6 +754,11 @@ static inline void pci_irq_pulse(PCIDevice *pci_dev)
> pci_irq_deassert(pci_dev);
> }
>
> +static inline int pci_is_cxl(const PCIDevice *d)
> +{
> + return d->cap_present & QEMU_PCIE_CAP_CXL;
> +}
> +
> static inline int pci_is_express(const PCIDevice *d)
> {
> return d->cap_present & QEMU_PCI_CAP_EXPRESS;
[RFC PATCH 12/25] acpi/pci: Consolidate host bridge setup, Ben Widawsky, 2020/11/11
[RFC PATCH 13/25] hw/pci: Plumb _UID through host bridges, Ben Widawsky, 2020/11/11
[RFC PATCH 14/25] hw/cxl/component: Implement host bridge MMIO (8.2.5, table 142), Ben Widawsky, 2020/11/11
[RFC PATCH 15/25] acpi/pxb/cxl: Reserve host bridge MMIO, Ben Widawsky, 2020/11/11
[RFC PATCH 16/25] hw/pxb/cxl: Add "windows" for host bridges, Ben Widawsky, 2020/11/11