[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 2/2] exec: Ensure variable page size is only used with TARGET
|
From: |
Richard Henderson |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 2/2] exec: Ensure variable page size is only used with TARGET_PAGE_BITS_VARY |
|
Date: |
Tue, 24 Nov 2020 08:12:39 -0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 |
On 11/4/20 1:35 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> If TARGET_PAGE_BITS_VARY is not supported, machines should not
> intent to modify the target page size.
> As set_preferred_target_page_bits() is supposed to return 'false'
> on failure (documented in "qemu-common.h"), return false to
> indicate failure if this ever happens.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
> ---
> include/qemu-common.h | 4 +++-
> exec-vary.c | 4 +++-
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/qemu-common.h b/include/qemu-common.h
> index fda7dc6ca77..3ea616d4567 100644
> --- a/include/qemu-common.h
> +++ b/include/qemu-common.h
> @@ -70,7 +70,9 @@ void cpu_exec_step_atomic(CPUState *cpu);
> * size may be smaller than any given CPU's preference).
> * Returns true on success, false on failure (which can only happen
> * if this is called after the system has already finalized its
> - * choice of page size and the requested page size is smaller than that).
> + * choice of page size and the requested page size is smaller than
> + * that). Only target supporting variable page size should set a
> + * preferred target page size.
> */
> bool set_preferred_target_page_bits(int bits);
>
> diff --git a/exec-vary.c b/exec-vary.c
> index ff905f2a8fb..4b0b7f193af 100644
> --- a/exec-vary.c
> +++ b/exec-vary.c
> @@ -86,8 +86,10 @@ bool set_preferred_target_page_bits(int bits)
> }
> init_target_page.bits = bits;
> }
> -#endif
> return true;
> +#else
> + return false;
> +#endif
I guess the only generic caller is the one in softmmu/vl.c, which is protected
by machine_class->minimum_page_bits != 0. So this affects exactly one machine
outside arm -- fuloong2e.
Certainly we should not allow an impossible setting. I wonder if it is worth
doing return bits == TARGET_PAGE_BITS?
Either way,
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
r~