[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 1/2] acpi: x86: pcihp: cleanup devfn usage in build_append_pc
|
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 1/2] acpi: x86: pcihp: cleanup devfn usage in build_append_pci_bus_devices() |
|
Date: |
Thu, 22 Jul 2021 13:56:18 -0400 |
I would add a description: we want to scan all functions
not just function 0 to describe hotplug into bridges
at function != 0. in preparation for this, refactor code to not
skip functions != 0.
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 06:59:44AM -0400, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 13 ++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> index 17836149fe..b40e284b72 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> @@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ static void build_append_pci_bus_devices(Aml
> *parent_scope, PCIBus *bus,
> Aml *dev, *notify_method = NULL, *method;
> QObject *bsel;
> PCIBus *sec;
> - int i;
> + int devfn;
>
> bsel = object_property_get_qobject(OBJECT(bus), ACPI_PCIHP_PROP_BSEL,
> NULL);
> if (bsel) {
> @@ -384,11 +384,11 @@ static void build_append_pci_bus_devices(Aml
> *parent_scope, PCIBus *bus,
> notify_method = aml_method("DVNT", 2, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
> }
>
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(bus->devices); i += PCI_FUNC_MAX) {
> + for (devfn = 0; devfn < ARRAY_SIZE(bus->devices); devfn++) {
> DeviceClass *dc;
> PCIDeviceClass *pc;
> - PCIDevice *pdev = bus->devices[i];
> - int slot = PCI_SLOT(i);
> + PCIDevice *pdev = bus->devices[devfn];
> + int slot = PCI_SLOT(devfn);
> bool hotplug_enabled_dev;
> bool bridge_in_acpi;
> bool cold_plugged_bridge;
I am a bit puzzled about why this is equivalent. so we used to scan just
function 0 on each slot. now we are scanning them all.
won't this generate a different AML code? in fact duplicate
descriptions?
I suspect you need to move the check for slot == 0 from the next patch
to this one otherwise bisect will be broken.
Or just squash this part into next patch. up to you.
> @@ -525,13 +525,12 @@ static void build_append_pci_bus_devices(Aml
> *parent_scope, PCIBus *bus,
> /* Notify about child bus events in any case */
> if (pcihp_bridge_en) {
> QLIST_FOREACH(sec, &bus->child, sibling) {
> - int32_t devfn = sec->parent_dev->devfn;
> -
> if (pci_bus_is_root(sec)) {
> continue;
> }
>
> - aml_append(method, aml_name("^S%.02X.PCNT", devfn));
> + aml_append(method, aml_name("^S%.02X.PCNT",
> + sec->parent_dev->devfn));
> }
> }
>
this is a refactor, sure.
> --
> 2.27.0
Re: [PATCH 2/2] acpi: x86: pcihp: add support hotplug on multifunction bridges, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2021/07/23
[PATCH 1/2] acpi: x86: pcihp: cleanup devfn usage in build_append_pci_bus_devices(), Igor Mammedov, 2021/07/22
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] acpi: x86: pcihp: cleanup devfn usage in build_append_pci_bus_devices(),
Michael S. Tsirkin <=
Re: [PATCH 0/2] acpi: pcihp: fix hotplug when bridge is wired to function > 0, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2021/07/22