[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] hw/i386/acpi-build: Get NUMA information from struct NumaSta
|
From: |
Igor Mammedov |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] hw/i386/acpi-build: Get NUMA information from struct NumaState |
|
Date: |
Thu, 5 Aug 2021 11:26:10 +0200 |
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 14:30:05 +0800
Jingqi Liu <jingqi.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> The NUMA information in PCMachineState is copied from MachineState.
> We get this information uniformly from struct NumaState in MachineState.
Is there a another reason behind this patch?
As cleanup it's not complete, why do you keep
PCMachineState::numa_nodes & co around?
I'd suggest to remove it completely and use data from
MachineState everywhere.
> Signed-off-by: Jingqi Liu <jingqi.liu@intel.com>
> ---
> hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 12 +++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> index 17836149fe..e3c9ad011e 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> @@ -1902,6 +1902,8 @@ build_srat(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
> MachineState *machine)
> X86MachineState *x86ms = X86_MACHINE(machine);
> const CPUArchIdList *apic_ids = mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids(machine);
> PCMachineState *pcms = PC_MACHINE(machine);
> + int nb_numa_nodes = machine->numa_state->num_nodes;
> + NodeInfo *numa_info = machine->numa_state->nodes;
> ram_addr_t hotplugabble_address_space_size =
> object_property_get_int(OBJECT(pcms), PC_MACHINE_DEVMEM_REGION_SIZE,
> NULL);
> @@ -1945,9 +1947,9 @@ build_srat(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
> MachineState *machine)
> next_base = 0;
> numa_start = table_data->len;
>
> - for (i = 1; i < pcms->numa_nodes + 1; ++i) {
> + for (i = 1; i < nb_numa_nodes + 1; ++i) {
> mem_base = next_base;
> - mem_len = pcms->node_mem[i - 1];
> + mem_len = numa_info[i - 1].node_mem;
> next_base = mem_base + mem_len;
>
> /* Cut out the 640K hole */
> @@ -1995,7 +1997,7 @@ build_srat(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
> MachineState *machine)
> }
>
> slots = (table_data->len - numa_start) / sizeof *numamem;
> - for (; slots < pcms->numa_nodes + 2; slots++) {
> + for (; slots < nb_numa_nodes + 2; slots++) {
> numamem = acpi_data_push(table_data, sizeof *numamem);
> build_srat_memory(numamem, 0, 0, 0, MEM_AFFINITY_NOFLAGS);
> }
> @@ -2011,7 +2013,7 @@ build_srat(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
> MachineState *machine)
> if (hotplugabble_address_space_size) {
> numamem = acpi_data_push(table_data, sizeof *numamem);
> build_srat_memory(numamem, machine->device_memory->base,
> - hotplugabble_address_space_size, pcms->numa_nodes
> - 1,
> + hotplugabble_address_space_size, nb_numa_nodes - 1,
> MEM_AFFINITY_HOTPLUGGABLE | MEM_AFFINITY_ENABLED);
> }
>
> @@ -2513,7 +2515,7 @@ void acpi_build(AcpiBuildTables *tables, MachineState
> *machine)
> }
> }
> #endif
> - if (pcms->numa_nodes) {
> + if (machine->numa_state->num_nodes) {
> acpi_add_table(table_offsets, tables_blob);
> build_srat(tables_blob, tables->linker, machine);
> if (machine->numa_state->have_numa_distance) {