Re: [PATCH v7 0/8] virtio-iommu: Add ACPI support (Arm part + tests)

[Jean-Philippe Brucker]

On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 10:04:57AM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 at 09:28, Jean-Philippe Brucker
> <jean-philippe@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 10:19:47AM +0530, Ani Sinha wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 10:35 PM Jean-Philippe Brucker
> > > <jean-philippe@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Add ACPI support for virtio-iommu on the virt machine, by instantiating
> > > > a VIOT table. Also add the tests for the ACPI table.
> > > >
> > > > Since last posting [1], I rebased onto v6.2.0-rc4. Note that v6 of this
> > > > series [2] only contained the table and x86 support, which have been
> > > > merged. Everything has now been reviewed and should be good to go.
> > > >
> > > > * Patches 1-2 add the VIOT table for the virt machine
> > > > * Patches 3-4 are minor fixes
> > > > * Patches 5-8 add tests for the VIOT table. They contain the tests for
> > > >   q35 as well, which didn't make it last time because they depended on
> > > >   another fix that has now been merged.
> > >
> > > I believe the entire patchset has been reviewed and you are re-sending
> > > it so that it gets pulled in after the release?
> >
> > Yes
> 
> To be clear, do you mean:
> (1) The patchset has been reviewed, and I plan to resend it (ie a v8)
> to be pulled in after 6.2 releases
> or
> (2) The patchset has been reviewed already as v6, and this (v7) was just
> a resend to be pulled in after 6.2 releases

I meant (2), v6 had already been reviewed and I'm resending v7 to be
pulled after 6.2 releases, sorry about the confusion.  Just for my
understanding, should I have resent this after the 6.2 release, or is this
OK and I should just state the intention for a patchset more clearly?

Thanks,
Jean