[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 1/4] tests: acpi: manually pad OEM_ID/OEM_TABLE_ID for test_o
|
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 1/4] tests: acpi: manually pad OEM_ID/OEM_TABLE_ID for test_oem_fields() test |
|
Date: |
Wed, 12 Jan 2022 08:44:19 -0500 |
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 08:03:29AM -0500, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> The next commit will revert OEM fields padding with whitespace to
> padding with '\0' as it was before [1]. As result test_oem_fields() will
> fail due to unexpectedly smaller ID sizes read from QEMU ACPI tables.
>
> Pad OEM_ID/OEM_TABLE_ID manually with spaces so that values the test
> puts on QEMU CLI and expected values match.
>
> 1) 602b458201 ("acpi: Permit OEM ID and OEM table ID fields to be changed")
> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
That's kind of ugly in that we do not test
shorter names then. How about we pad with \0 instead?
And add a comment explaining why it's done.
> ---
> tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c | 15 ++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c b/tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c
> index e6b72d9026..90c9f6a0a2 100644
> --- a/tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c
> +++ b/tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c
> @@ -71,9 +71,10 @@
>
> #define ACPI_REBUILD_EXPECTED_AML "TEST_ACPI_REBUILD_AML"
>
> -#define OEM_ID "TEST"
> -#define OEM_TABLE_ID "OEM"
> -#define OEM_TEST_ARGS "-machine
> x-oem-id="OEM_ID",x-oem-table-id="OEM_TABLE_ID
> +#define OEM_ID "TEST "
> +#define OEM_TABLE_ID "OEM "
> +#define OEM_TEST_ARGS "-machine x-oem-id='" OEM_ID "',x-oem-table-id='"
> \
> + OEM_TABLE_ID "'"
>
> typedef struct {
> bool tcg_only;
> @@ -1519,11 +1520,7 @@ static void test_acpi_q35_slic(void)
> static void test_oem_fields(test_data *data)
> {
> int i;
> - char oem_id[6];
> - char oem_table_id[8];
>
> - strpadcpy(oem_id, sizeof oem_id, OEM_ID, ' ');
> - strpadcpy(oem_table_id, sizeof oem_table_id, OEM_TABLE_ID, ' ');
> for (i = 0; i < data->tables->len; ++i) {
> AcpiSdtTable *sdt;
>
> @@ -1533,8 +1530,8 @@ static void test_oem_fields(test_data *data)
> continue;
> }
>
> - g_assert(memcmp(sdt->aml + 10, oem_id, 6) == 0);
> - g_assert(memcmp(sdt->aml + 16, oem_table_id, 8) == 0);
> + g_assert(memcmp(sdt->aml + 10, OEM_ID, 6) == 0);
> + g_assert(memcmp(sdt->aml + 16, OEM_TABLE_ID, 8) == 0);
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.31.1
- [PATCH 0/4] acpi: fix short OEM [Table] ID padding, Igor Mammedov, 2022/01/12
- [PATCH 4/4] tests: acpi: update expected blobs, Igor Mammedov, 2022/01/12
- [PATCH 2/4] tests: acpi: whitelist nvdimm's SSDT and FACP.slic expected blobs, Igor Mammedov, 2022/01/12
- [PATCH 3/4] acpi: fix OEM ID/OEM Table ID padding, Igor Mammedov, 2022/01/12
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] acpi: fix OEM ID/OEM Table ID padding, Ani Sinha, 2022/01/12