[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] contrib/plugins: add mask plugin
|
From: |
Vasilev Oleg |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] contrib/plugins: add mask plugin |
|
Date: |
Mon, 31 Jan 2022 12:30:18 +0000 |
On 1/24/2022 3:26 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Oleg Vasilev <me@svin.in> writes:
>
>> From: Oleg Vasilev <vasilev.oleg@huawei.com>
>>
>> Plugin can be used to track statistics based on virtual address mask
>> matching.
>> Useful for tracking kernel vs user translation blocks.
> Could we have a bit more detail please, maybe some words for
> devel/tcg/plugins.rst. Running:
>
> ./qemu-system-x86_64 -monitor none -display none -chardev
> file,path=test.out,id=output -device isa-debugcon,chardev=output -device
> isa-debug-exit,iobase=0xf4,iosize=0x4 -
> kernel ./tests/tcg/x86_64-softmmu/memory -plugin contrib/plugins/libmask.so
> -d plugin
> hint: all, mask: 0x0000000000000000, bits: 0x0000000000000000, hit_rate:
> 0.999023, mask_freq: 0.000004, tb_exec: 1024, tb_trans: 1
> hint: kernel, mask: 0x8000000000000000, bits: 0x8000000000000000, hit_rate:
> -nan, mask_freq: 0.000000, tb_exec: 0, tb_trans: 0
> hint: user, mask: 0x8000000000000000, bits: 0x0000000000000000, hit_rate:
> 0.999023, mask_freq: 0.000004, tb_exec: 1024, tb_trans: 1
> hint: all, mask: 0x0000000000000000, bits: 0x0000000000000000, hit_rate:
> 0.999849, mask_freq: 0.078281, tb_exec: 21013504, tb_trans: 3169
> hint: kernel, mask: 0x8000000000000000, bits: 0x8000000000000000, hit_rate:
> -nan, mask_freq: 0.000000, tb_exec: 0, tb_trans: 0
> hint: user, mask: 0x8000000000000000, bits: 0x0000000000000000, hit_rate:
> 0.999849, mask_freq: 0.078281, tb_exec: 21013504, tb_trans: 3169
>
> ends up being a bit incomprehensible.
>> Signed-off-by: Oleg Vasilev <vasilev.oleg@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Oleg Vasilev <me@svin.in>
>> ---
>> contrib/plugins/Makefile | 1 +
>> contrib/plugins/mask.c | 144 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 145 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 contrib/plugins/mask.c
>>
>> diff --git a/contrib/plugins/Makefile b/contrib/plugins/Makefile
>> index 54ac5ccd9f..7e9cb51c9d 100644
>> --- a/contrib/plugins/Makefile
>> +++ b/contrib/plugins/Makefile
>> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ NAMES += howvec
>> NAMES += lockstep
>> NAMES += hwprofile
>> NAMES += cache
>> +NAMES += mask
>>
>> SONAMES := $(addsuffix .so,$(addprefix lib,$(NAMES)))
>>
>> diff --git a/contrib/plugins/mask.c b/contrib/plugins/mask.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000..c6d2bd2386
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/contrib/plugins/mask.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (C) 2022, Oleg Vasilev <vasilev.oleg@huawei.com>
>> + *
>> + * Track statistics based on virtual address mask matching.
>> + * Useful for tracking kernel vs user translation blocks.
>> + *
>> + * License: GNU GPL, version 2 or later.
>> + * See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <assert.h>
>> +#include <compiler.h>
>> +#include <glib.h>
>> +#include <inttypes.h>
>> +#include <qemu-plugin.h>
>> +#include <stdio.h>
>> +#include <stdlib.h>
>> +#include <string.h>
>> +#include <unistd.h>
>> +
>> +#include <atomic.h>
>> +
>> +QEMU_PLUGIN_EXPORT int qemu_plugin_version = QEMU_PLUGIN_VERSION;
>> +
>> +typedef struct {
>> + GMutex lock;
>> + const char *hint;
>> + uint64_t mask;
>> + uint64_t bits;
>> + uint64_t tb_exec;
>> + uint64_t tb_trans;
>> + uint64_t isins;
>> +} MaskCounter;
>> +
>> +static GPtrArray *counters;
>> +
>> +static uint64_t report_every = 1 << 28;
>> +static uint64_t tb_exec_every = 1 << 10;
>> +static uint64_t total_tb_exec;
>> +
>> +static void gen_one_report(MaskCounter *counter, GString *report)
>> +{
>> + g_mutex_lock(&counter->lock);
>> + uint64_t tb_exec = counter->tb_exec * tb_exec_every;
>> +
>> + double hit_rate = (double)counter->tb_trans / tb_exec;
>> + hit_rate = 1 - hit_rate;
>> +
>> + double mask_freq = (double) counter->tb_exec * tb_exec_every /
>> report_every;
>> +
>> + g_string_append_printf(report,
>> + "hint: %s, mask: 0x%016lx, bits: 0x%016lx,
>> hit_rate: %f, "
>> + "mask_freq: %f, tb_exec: %ld, tb_trans: %ld\n",
>> + counter->hint, counter->mask, counter->bits,
>> hit_rate,
>> + mask_freq, tb_exec, counter->tb_trans);
> Could aiming for plainer CSV format make this information more
> digestible by tooling?
Hi, thanks for looking at the patch!
What do you think, tskv would be fine, considering some tooling exists and it
is also readable for eyes?
Like this:
hint=kernel hit_rate=0.999923 freq=0.110752 execs=29729792
translations=2299
hint=user hit_rate=0.999952 freq=0.889248 execs=238705664
translations=11557
>
>> +
>> + counter->tb_exec = 0;
>> + counter->tb_trans = 0;
>> + counter->isins = 0;
> Would it be worth tracking total lifetime vs period counts?
Probably so, will add a config option to specify period length.
>> +
>> + g_mutex_unlock(&counter->lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void report_all(void)
>> +{
>> + g_autoptr(GString) report = g_string_new("");
>> + g_ptr_array_foreach(counters, (GFunc)gen_one_report, report);
>> + qemu_plugin_outs(report->str);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void plugin_exit(qemu_plugin_id_t id, void *p)
>> +{
>> + report_all();
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool match(MaskCounter *counter, struct qemu_plugin_tb *tb)
>> +{
>> + return (counter->mask & qemu_plugin_tb_vaddr(tb)) == counter->bits;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void tb_exec(MaskCounter *counter, struct qemu_plugin_tb *tb)
>> +{
>> + if (!match(counter, tb)) {
>> + return;
>> + }
>> + g_mutex_lock(&counter->lock);
>> + counter->tb_exec++;
>> + g_mutex_unlock(&counter->lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void vcpu_tb_exec(unsigned int cpu_index, void *tb)
>> +{
>> + uint64_t cur_tb_exec = qatomic_fetch_inc(&total_tb_exec);
>> + if ((cur_tb_exec & (tb_exec_every - 1)) == 0) {
>> + g_ptr_array_foreach(counters, (GFunc)tb_exec, tb);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if ((cur_tb_exec & (report_every - 1)) == 0) {
>> + report_all();
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void tb_trans(MaskCounter *counter, struct qemu_plugin_tb *tb)
>> +{
>> + if (!match(counter, tb)) {
>> + return;
>> + }
>> + g_mutex_lock(&counter->lock);
>> + counter->tb_trans++;
>> + g_mutex_unlock(&counter->lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void vcpu_tb_trans(qemu_plugin_id_t id, struct qemu_plugin_tb *tb)
>> +{
>> + qemu_plugin_register_vcpu_tb_exec_cb(tb, vcpu_tb_exec,
>> + QEMU_PLUGIN_CB_NO_REGS, tb);
> You can't pass qemu_plugin_tb to the exec handler like this as it is
> only valid during the lifetime of translation. You need to extract the
> information you need (qemu_plugin_tb_vaddr(tb)) and pass that.
>
> The restriction is the same as we state for qemu_plugin_tb_get_insn():
>
> The returned handle can be used in follow up helper queries as well
> as when instrumenting an instruction. It is only valid for the
> lifetime of the callback.
>
> but it isn't attached to a API docs, we do mention it in the general
> principles:
>
> Lifetime of the query handle
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Each callback provides an opaque anonymous information handle which
> can usually be further queried to find out information about a
> translation, instruction or operation. The handles themselves are only
> valid during the lifetime of the callback so it is important that any
> information that is needed is extracted during the callback and saved
> by the plugin.
>
If I were to allocate a distinct structure per tb here, how could I free it? Or
is it fine to just leave it leaked?
Perhaps a new cb helper should be added for flush htable event, when we could
reset all current tb structures?
>> + g_ptr_array_foreach(counters, (GFunc)tb_trans, tb);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void add_counter(const char *hint, uint64_t mask, uint64_t bits)
>> +{
>> + MaskCounter *counter = g_new0(MaskCounter, 1);
>> + counter->hint = hint;
>> + counter->mask = mask;
>> + counter->bits = bits;
>> + g_mutex_init(&counter->lock);
>> + g_ptr_array_add(counters, counter);
>> +}
>> +
>> +QEMU_PLUGIN_EXPORT int qemu_plugin_install(qemu_plugin_id_t id,
>> + const qemu_info_t *info, int
>> argc,
>> + char **argv)
>> +{
>> + counters = g_ptr_array_new();
>> +
>> + // Update for a different mask
>> + add_counter("all", 0, 0);
>> + add_counter("kernel", 0x1ll << 63, 0x1ll << 63);
>> + add_counter("user", 0x1ll << 63, 0);
> These seem very fixed - do they apply for all kernels/architectures?
> Perhaps we could have sensible defaults based on info->target_name with
> an option to hand set zones via CLI options?
Generally for linux kernel the highest bit indicated kernel space AFAIK.
Sensible default probably here would be to determine the highest bit based on
64 vs 32 bit current architecture.
Regarding the CLI options, I considered adding that, and I am thinking those
would be too complex. Much easier would be to change the code and write the
correct mask. Do you think this can be merged without the CLI options,
expecting users to modify these lines to achieve different zoning?
Best regards,
Oleg
>
> Also what should happen in the case of !info->system_emulation? There is
> probably a case for something similar tracking execution in various .so
> libs but that would need a little additional information from the
> infrastructure to track.
>
>> +
>> + qemu_plugin_register_vcpu_tb_trans_cb(id, vcpu_tb_trans);
>> + qemu_plugin_register_atexit_cb(id, plugin_exit, NULL);
>> + return 0;
>> +}