[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PULL 0/5] 9p queue 2022-02-10
|
From: |
Christian Schoenebeck |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PULL 0/5] 9p queue 2022-02-10 |
|
Date: |
Wed, 16 Feb 2022 11:30:12 +0100 |
On Dienstag, 15. Februar 2022 08:01:37 CET Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 17:43:51 +0300
>
> Vitaly Chikunov <vt@altlinux.org> wrote:
> > Why g_new0 and not just g_malloc0? This is smallest code change, which
> > seems appropriate for a bug fix.
>
> I prefer g_new0() for the exact reasons that are provided in QEMU's
> official coding style docs/devel/style.rst:
[...]
> I'm fine with the acceptable version as well. The only important thing is
> to fix the synth backend.
>
> Cheers,
Hi, is anybody working on a v5 of this patch? If not I will send one this
evening to bring this issue forward, because it is blocking my queue.
Best regards,
Christian Schoenebeck
- [PULL 1/5] tests/9pfs: use g_autofree where possible, (continued)
- [PULL 1/5] tests/9pfs: use g_autofree where possible, Christian Schoenebeck, 2022/02/10
- Re: [PULL 0/5] 9p queue 2022-02-10, Peter Maydell, 2022/02/13
- Re: [PULL 0/5] 9p queue 2022-02-10, Christian Schoenebeck, 2022/02/14
- Re: [PULL 0/5] 9p queue 2022-02-10, Greg Kurz, 2022/02/14
- Re: [PULL 0/5] 9p queue 2022-02-10, Christian Schoenebeck, 2022/02/14
- Re: [PULL 0/5] 9p queue 2022-02-10, Vitaly Chikunov, 2022/02/14
- Re: [PULL 0/5] 9p queue 2022-02-10, Christian Schoenebeck, 2022/02/14
- Re: [PULL 0/5] 9p queue 2022-02-10, Greg Kurz, 2022/02/15
- Re: [PULL 0/5] 9p queue 2022-02-10,
Christian Schoenebeck <=
- Re: [PULL 0/5] 9p queue 2022-02-10, Greg Kurz, 2022/02/16
- Re: [PULL 0/5] 9p queue 2022-02-10, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2022/02/16
- Re: [PULL 0/5] 9p queue 2022-02-10, Vitaly Chikunov, 2022/02/16
- Re: [PULL 0/5] 9p queue 2022-02-10, Christian Schoenebeck, 2022/02/16