Re: [PATCH v3] Hexagon (target/hexagon) properly handle NaN in dfmin/dfmax/sfmin/sfmax

[Richard Henderson]

On 2/16/22 15:39, Taylor Simpson wrote:
> The float??_minnum implementation differs from Hexagon for SNaN,
> it returns NaN, but Hexagon returns the other input.  So, we use
> float??_minimum_number.  For double precision, we check for QNaN and
> raise the invalid flag.

I'm surprised that the behaviour for double differs from single, but the docs are light on 
the subject.  Anyway,

Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>


r~