qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 6/8] char: move qemu_openpty_raw from util/ to char/


From: Daniel P . Berrangé
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] char: move qemu_openpty_raw from util/ to char/
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 11:14:04 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/2.1.5 (2021-12-30)

On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 11:07:19AM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 at 09:13, Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
> > We only support the current major release, and thue previous major
> > release for 2 years overlap. If we consider 11.x releases as major,
> > then 11.3 went out of scope from QEMU's POV in Aug 2020, and thus
> > we don't need to care about this code.
> >
> > More generally though, Solaris isn't even a platform we try to
> > support at all is it ?
> >
> > We've never had any formal testing on it. Have we seen people filing
> > bugs mentioning solaris in the last 5 years ? If QEMU works at all,
> > I suspect it is merely by luck.
> 
> This last came up in June 2020:
> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/CAEgYsbE7s5hD+5ARj_Xt1D0ALDPDQx7uvocd5zRF6P=EzwxTZQ@mail.gmail.com/
> 
> where somebody pointed out that illumos also doesn't (didn't?)
> support openpty(). So we do have at least one or two people
> who have tried to compile on Solaris and been enthusiastic
> enough to post to the mailing list about it.

Ah yes, and we even updated the comment to say we're keeping this for
Illumos, not for Solaris

  commit 9df8b20d1632d108da316134d4d86a00b4028803
  Author: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
  Date:   Mon Jun 29 14:13:24 2020 +0200

    configure / util: Auto-detect the availability of openpty()


Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]