qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] coreaudio: Always return 0 in handle_voice_change


From: Christian Schoenebeck
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coreaudio: Always return 0 in handle_voice_change
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2022 13:16:52 +0100

On Sonntag, 6. März 2022 11:54:00 CET Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> On 2022/03/06 19:49, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > On Sonntag, 6. März 2022 07:39:49 CET Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> >> MacOSX.sdk/System/Library/Frameworks/CoreAudio.framework/Headers/AudioHar
> >> dwa re.h
> >> 
> >> says:
> >>> The return value is currently unused and should always be 0.
> > 
> > Where does it say that, about which macOS functions? There are quite a
> > bunch of macOS functions involved in init_out_device(), and they all have
> > error pathes in init_out_device(), and they still will have them after
> > this patch.
> > 
> > And again, I'm missing: this as an improvement because? Is this a user
> > invisible improvement (e.g. removing redundant branches), or is this a
> > user
> > visible improvement, i.e. does it fix a misbehaviour? In case of the
> > latter, which misbehaviour did you encounter?
> 
> handle_voice_change itself is a callback.
> It is invisible for a user since "the return value is currently unused".

Then the commit log should be more specific and say something like:

"
handle_voice_change() is a CoreAudio callback function as of CoreAudio type 
'AudioObjectPropertyListenerProc', and for the latter MacOSX.sdk/System/
Library/Frameworks/CoreAudio.framework/Headers/AudioHardware.h
says 'The return value is currently unused and should always be 0.'.
"

Nevertheless, personally I would not change that, but I won't object either.

I read it like "The CoreAudio subsystem of macOS currently ignores the result 
of your callback, and for that reason simply return 0 for now.". It does not 
say "you must not return anything else than 0". ATM it simply does not matter 
what you return here.

Best regards,
Christian Schoenebeck





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]