[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 3/6] tests/9pfs: compare QIDs in fs_walk_none() test
From: |
Christian Schoenebeck |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 3/6] tests/9pfs: compare QIDs in fs_walk_none() test |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Mar 2022 10:04:50 +0100 |
On Mittwoch, 9. März 2022 15:49:04 CET Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> Extend previously added fs_walk_none() test by comparing the QID
> of the root fid with the QID of the cloned fid. They should be
> equal.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com>
> ---
> tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c b/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c
> index 6c00da03f4..9098e21173 100644
> --- a/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c
> +++ b/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c
> @@ -146,6 +146,11 @@ static void v9fs_uint16_read(P9Req *req, uint16_t *val)
> le16_to_cpus(val);
> }
>
> +static void v9fs_int16_read(P9Req *req, int16_t *val)
> +{
> + v9fs_uint16_read(req, (uint16_t *)val);
> +}
> +
> static void v9fs_uint32_write(P9Req *req, uint32_t val)
> {
> uint32_t le_val = cpu_to_le32(val);
> @@ -166,12 +171,22 @@ static void v9fs_uint32_read(P9Req *req, uint32_t
> *val) le32_to_cpus(val);
> }
>
> +static void v9fs_int32_read(P9Req *req, int32_t *val)
> +{
> + v9fs_uint32_read(req, (uint32_t *)val);
> +}
> +
> static void v9fs_uint64_read(P9Req *req, uint64_t *val)
> {
> v9fs_memread(req, val, 8);
> le64_to_cpus(val);
> }
>
> +static void v9fs_int64_read(P9Req *req, int64_t *val)
> +{
> + v9fs_uint64_read(req, (uint64_t *)val);
> +}
> +
> /* len[2] string[len] */
> static uint16_t v9fs_string_size(const char *string)
> {
> @@ -425,6 +440,40 @@ static void v9fs_rwalk(P9Req *req, uint16_t *nwqid,
> v9fs_qid **wqid) v9fs_req_free(req);
> }
>
> +/* size[4] Tstat tag[2] fid[4] */
> +static P9Req *v9fs_tstat(QVirtio9P *v9p, uint32_t fid, uint16_t tag)
> +{
> + P9Req *req;
> +
> + req = v9fs_req_init(v9p, 4, P9_TSTAT, tag);
> + v9fs_uint32_write(req, fid);
> + v9fs_req_send(req);
> + return req;
> +}
> +
> +/* size[4] Rstat tag[2] stat[n] */
> +static void v9fs_rstat(P9Req *req, struct V9fsStat *st)
> +{
> + v9fs_req_recv(req, P9_RSTAT);
> +
> + v9fs_int16_read(req, &st->size);
> + v9fs_int16_read(req, &st->type);
> + v9fs_int32_read(req, &st->dev);
> + v9fs_uint8_read(req, &st->qid.type);
> + v9fs_uint32_read(req, &st->qid.version);
> + v9fs_uint64_read(req, &st->qid.path);
> + v9fs_int32_read(req, &st->mode);
> + v9fs_int32_read(req, &st->mtime);
> + v9fs_int32_read(req, &st->atime);
> + v9fs_int64_read(req, &st->length);
> + v9fs_string_read(req, &st->name.size, &st->name.data);
> + v9fs_string_read(req, &st->uid.size, &st->uid.data);
> + v9fs_string_read(req, &st->gid.size, &st->gid.data);
> + v9fs_string_read(req, &st->muid.size, &st->muid.data);
> +
> + v9fs_req_free(req);
> +}
> +
> /* size[4] Treaddir tag[2] fid[4] offset[8] count[4] */
> static P9Req *v9fs_treaddir(QVirtio9P *v9p, uint32_t fid, uint64_t offset,
> uint32_t count, uint16_t tag)
> @@ -1009,6 +1058,8 @@ static void fs_walk_none(void *obj, void *data,
> QGuestAllocator *t_alloc) v9fs_qid root_qid;
> g_autofree v9fs_qid *wqid = NULL;
> P9Req *req;
> + struct V9fsStat st[2];
> + int i;
>
> do_version(v9p);
> req = v9fs_tattach(v9p, 0, getuid(), 0);
> @@ -1021,6 +1072,25 @@ static void fs_walk_none(void *obj, void *data,
> QGuestAllocator *t_alloc)
>
> /* special case: no QID is returned if nwname=0 was sent */
> g_assert(wqid == NULL);
> +
> + req = v9fs_tstat(v9p, 0, 0);
> + v9fs_req_wait_for_reply(req, NULL);
> + v9fs_rstat(req, &st[0]);
Probably stat-ing the root fid (0) should happen before sending Twalk, to
better counter the 1st fid (0) having become potentially mutated?
> +
> + req = v9fs_tstat(v9p, 1, 0);
> + v9fs_req_wait_for_reply(req, NULL);
> + v9fs_rstat(req, &st[1]);
> +
> + /* don't compare QID version for checking for file ID equalness */
> + g_assert(st[0].qid.type == st[1].qid.type);
> + g_assert(st[0].qid.path == st[1].qid.path);
I could add a helper function is_same_qid() for this if desired.
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
> + g_free(st[i].name.data);
> + g_free(st[i].uid.data);
> + g_free(st[i].gid.data);
> + g_free(st[i].muid.data);
> + }
I didn't find a more elegant way to do this cleanup.
> }
>
> static void fs_walk_dotdot(void *obj, void *data, QGuestAllocator *t_alloc)
[PATCH 5/6] 9pfs: fix 'Twalk' to only send error if no component walked, Christian Schoenebeck, 2022/03/09