qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] hmat acpi: Don't require initiator value in -numa when hmat=


From: Brice Goglin
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hmat acpi: Don't require initiator value in -numa when hmat=on
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 17:24:18 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0

Le 20/06/2022 à 15:27, Igor Mammedov a écrit Machine (2966MB total) + Package P#0
    NUMANode P#2 (979MB)
    Group0
      NUMANode P#0 (980MB)
      Core P#0 + PU P#0
      Core P#1 + PU P#1
    Group0
      NUMANode P#1 (1007MB)
      Core P#2 + PU P#2
      Core P#3 + PU P#3
here should be a dis-assembled dump of generated HMAT table


Hello

Like what I added at the end of https://github.com/bgoglin/qemu/commit/d9b3f5cb1514adafa644afcc2a363f2dc9795a32 ?


+ a test case, see tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c
for the process (at tho top) and test examples


https://github.com/bgoglin/qemu/commit/643dfa2de8b3e1f5b5675825e5d1be5c93a9549c

This passes make check V=1 but I am really not sure about what I did. The doc is far from easy for new contributors. Only HMAT matters here, but it looks like it wanted some other tables too. Also I don't know about pc vs piix4 vs q35, what "tcg" is, etc.

Advices appreciated.


How are we supposed to send patches that contain binary changes?

Brice



Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]