[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH V8 28/39] vfio-pci: cpr part 2 (msi)
From: |
Alex Williamson |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH V8 28/39] vfio-pci: cpr part 2 (msi) |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Jun 2022 14:19:13 -0600 |
On Wed, 15 Jun 2022 07:52:15 -0700
Steve Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com> wrote:
> Finish cpr for vfio-pci MSI/MSI-X devices by preserving eventfd's and
> vector state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steve Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com>
> ---
> hw/vfio/pci.c | 122
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 121 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.c b/hw/vfio/pci.c
> index 237231b..2fd7121 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/pci.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/pci.c
> @@ -53,17 +53,53 @@ static void vfio_disable_interrupts(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev);
> static void vfio_mmap_set_enabled(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, bool enabled);
> static void vfio_msi_disable_common(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev);
>
> +#define EVENT_FD_NAME(vdev, name) \
> + g_strdup_printf("%s_%s", (vdev)->vbasedev.name, (name))
> +
> +static int save_event_fd(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, const char *name, int nr,
> + EventNotifier *ev)
> +{
> + int fd = event_notifier_get_fd(ev);
> +
> + if (fd >= 0) {
> + Error *err;
> + g_autofree char *fdname = EVENT_FD_NAME(vdev, name);
> +
> + if (cpr_resave_fd(fdname, nr, fd, &err)) {
> + error_report_err(err);
> + return 1;
Preferably -1, but the caller doesn't actually test the return value
anyway :-\
> + }
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int load_event_fd(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, const char *name, int nr)
> +{
> + g_autofree char *fdname = EVENT_FD_NAME(vdev, name);
> + int fd = cpr_find_fd(fdname, nr);
> + return fd;
return cpr_find_fd(EVENT_FD_NAME(vdev, name), nr);
> +}
> +
> +static void delete_event_fd(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, const char *name, int nr)
> +{
> + g_autofree char *fdname = EVENT_FD_NAME(vdev, name);
> + cpr_delete_fd(fdname, nr);
cpr_delete_fd(EVENT_FD_NAME(vdev, name), nr);
> +}
> +
> /* Create new or reuse existing eventfd */
> static int vfio_notifier_init(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, EventNotifier *e,
> const char *name, int nr)
> {
> - int fd = -1; /* placeholder until a subsequent patch */
> int ret = 0;
> + int fd = load_event_fd(vdev, name, nr);
>
> if (fd >= 0) {
> event_notifier_init_fd(e, fd);
> } else {
> ret = event_notifier_init(e, 0);
> + if (!ret) {
> + save_event_fd(vdev, name, nr, e);
Return value not tested. The function generates an error report if it
fails, but it doesn't seem that actually blocks a cpr attempt. Do we
just wind up with that error report as a breadcrumb to why cpr breaks
with a missing fd down the road?
> + }
> }
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -71,6 +107,7 @@ static int vfio_notifier_init(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev,
> EventNotifier *e,
> static void vfio_notifier_cleanup(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, EventNotifier *e,
> const char *name, int nr)
> {
> + delete_event_fd(vdev, name, nr);
> event_notifier_cleanup(e);
> }
>
> @@ -511,6 +548,15 @@ static int vfio_msix_vector_do_use(PCIDevice *pdev,
> unsigned int nr,
> VFIOMSIVector *vector;
> int ret;
>
> + /*
> + * Ignore the callback from msix_set_vector_notifiers during resume.
> + * The necessary subset of these actions is called from
> vfio_claim_vectors
> + * during post load.
> + */
> + if (vdev->vbasedev.reused) {
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> trace_vfio_msix_vector_do_use(vdev->vbasedev.name, nr);
>
> vector = &vdev->msi_vectors[nr];
> @@ -2784,6 +2830,11 @@ static void vfio_register_err_notifier(VFIOPCIDevice
> *vdev)
> fd = event_notifier_get_fd(&vdev->err_notifier);
> qemu_set_fd_handler(fd, vfio_err_notifier_handler, NULL, vdev);
>
> + /* Do not alter irq_signaling during vfio_realize for cpr */
> + if (vdev->vbasedev.reused) {
> + return;
> + }
> +
> if (vfio_set_irq_signaling(&vdev->vbasedev, VFIO_PCI_ERR_IRQ_INDEX, 0,
> VFIO_IRQ_SET_ACTION_TRIGGER, fd, &err)) {
> error_reportf_err(err, VFIO_MSG_PREFIX, vdev->vbasedev.name);
> @@ -2849,6 +2900,12 @@ static void vfio_register_req_notifier(VFIOPCIDevice
> *vdev)
> fd = event_notifier_get_fd(&vdev->req_notifier);
> qemu_set_fd_handler(fd, vfio_req_notifier_handler, NULL, vdev);
>
> + /* Do not alter irq_signaling during vfio_realize for cpr */
> + if (vdev->vbasedev.reused) {
> + vdev->req_enabled = true;
> + return;
> + }
vfio_notifier_init() transparently gets the old fd or creates a new
one, how do we know which has occurred to know that this eventfd is
already configured?
Don't we also have the same issue relative to vdev->pci_aer for the
error handler?
> +
> if (vfio_set_irq_signaling(&vdev->vbasedev, VFIO_PCI_REQ_IRQ_INDEX, 0,
> VFIO_IRQ_SET_ACTION_TRIGGER, fd, &err)) {
> error_reportf_err(err, VFIO_MSG_PREFIX, vdev->vbasedev.name);
> @@ -3357,6 +3414,43 @@ static Property vfio_pci_dev_properties[] = {
> DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
> };
>
> +static void vfio_claim_vectors(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, int nr_vectors, bool
> msix)
> +{
> + int i, fd;
> + bool pending = false;
> + PCIDevice *pdev = &vdev->pdev;
> +
> + vdev->nr_vectors = nr_vectors;
> + vdev->msi_vectors = g_new0(VFIOMSIVector, nr_vectors);
> + vdev->interrupt = msix ? VFIO_INT_MSIX : VFIO_INT_MSI;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_vectors; i++) {
> + VFIOMSIVector *vector = &vdev->msi_vectors[i];
> +
> + fd = load_event_fd(vdev, "interrupt", i);
> + if (fd >= 0) {
> + vfio_vector_init(vdev, i);
> + qemu_set_fd_handler(fd, vfio_msi_interrupt, NULL, vector);
> + }
> +
> + if (load_event_fd(vdev, "kvm_interrupt", i) >= 0) {
> + vfio_route_change = kvm_irqchip_begin_route_changes(kvm_state);
> + vfio_add_kvm_msi_virq(vdev, vector, i, msix);
> + kvm_irqchip_commit_route_changes(&vfio_route_change);
> + vfio_connect_kvm_msi_virq(vector, i);
Shouldn't we take advantage of the batching support here?
> + }
How do we debug if one of the above fails that shouldn't have failed?
Should we have an assert or change this to a non-void return if we
cannot setup an interrupt that we think is configured?
> +
> + if (msix && msix_is_pending(pdev, i) && msix_is_masked(pdev, i)) {
> + set_bit(i, vdev->msix->pending);
> + pending = true;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (msix) {
> + memory_region_set_enabled(&pdev->msix_pba_mmio, pending);
> + }
> +}
> +
> /*
> * The kernel may change non-emulated config bits. Exclude them from the
> * changed-bits check in get_pci_config_device.
> @@ -3375,6 +3469,29 @@ static int vfio_pci_pre_load(void *opaque)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int vfio_pci_post_load(void *opaque, int version_id)
> +{
> + VFIOPCIDevice *vdev = opaque;
> + PCIDevice *pdev = &vdev->pdev;
> + int nr_vectors;
> +
> + if (msix_enabled(pdev)) {
> + msix_set_vector_notifiers(pdev, vfio_msix_vector_use,
> + vfio_msix_vector_release, NULL);
> + nr_vectors = vdev->msix->entries;
Maybe this is why we're not generating an error above, we don't know
which vectors are configured other than if they have a saved eventfd,
where we don't test whether we were able to actually save the fd.
Thanks,
Alex
> + vfio_claim_vectors(vdev, nr_vectors, true);
> +
> + } else if (msi_enabled(pdev)) {
> + nr_vectors = msi_nr_vectors_allocated(pdev);
> + vfio_claim_vectors(vdev, nr_vectors, false);
> +
> + } else if (vfio_pci_read_config(pdev, PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN, 1)) {
> + assert(0); /* completed in a subsequent patch */
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static bool vfio_pci_needed(void *opaque)
> {
> return cpr_get_mode() == CPR_MODE_RESTART;
> @@ -3387,8 +3504,11 @@ static const VMStateDescription vfio_pci_vmstate = {
> .minimum_version_id = 0,
> .priority = MIG_PRI_VFIO_PCI, /* must load before container */
> .pre_load = vfio_pci_pre_load,
> + .post_load = vfio_pci_post_load,
> .needed = vfio_pci_needed,
> .fields = (VMStateField[]) {
> + VMSTATE_PCI_DEVICE(pdev, VFIOPCIDevice),
> + VMSTATE_MSIX_TEST(pdev, VFIOPCIDevice, vfio_msix_present),
> VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
> }
> };
- [PATCH V8 22/39] cpr: ram block blockers, (continued)
- [PATCH V8 22/39] cpr: ram block blockers, Steve Sistare, 2022/06/15
- [PATCH V8 23/39] hostmem-memfd: cpr for memory-backend-memfd, Steve Sistare, 2022/06/15
- [PATCH V8 19/39] cpr: preserve extra state, Steve Sistare, 2022/06/15
- [PATCH V8 21/39] cpr: restart HMP interfaces, Steve Sistare, 2022/06/15
- [PATCH V8 24/39] pci: export export msix_is_pending, Steve Sistare, 2022/06/15
- [PATCH V8 31/39] vhost: reset vhost devices for cpr, Steve Sistare, 2022/06/15
- [PATCH V8 26/39] vfio-pci: refactor for cpr, Steve Sistare, 2022/06/15
- [PATCH V8 36/39] chardev: cpr for sockets, Steve Sistare, 2022/06/15
- [PATCH V8 28/39] vfio-pci: cpr part 2 (msi), Steve Sistare, 2022/06/15
- Re: [PATCH V8 28/39] vfio-pci: cpr part 2 (msi),
Alex Williamson <=
- [PATCH V8 33/39] chardev: cpr framework, Steve Sistare, 2022/06/15
- [PATCH V8 35/39] chardev: cpr for pty, Steve Sistare, 2022/06/15
- [PATCH V8 32/39] loader: suppress rom_reset during cpr, Steve Sistare, 2022/06/15
- [PATCH V8 37/39] cpr: only-cpr-capable option, Steve Sistare, 2022/06/15
- [PATCH V8 27/39] vfio-pci: cpr part 1 (fd and dma), Steve Sistare, 2022/06/15
- [PATCH V8 34/39] chardev: cpr for simple devices, Steve Sistare, 2022/06/15
- [PATCH V8 39/39] tests/avocado: add cpr regression test, Steve Sistare, 2022/06/15
- [PATCH V8 30/39] vfio-pci: recover from unmap-all-vaddr failure, Steve Sistare, 2022/06/15