[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 17/66] target/arm: Add is_secure parameter to get_phys_add
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 17/66] target/arm: Add is_secure parameter to get_phys_addr_lpae |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Sep 2022 15:52:45 +0100 |
On Mon, 22 Aug 2022 at 17:33, Richard Henderson
<richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Remove the use of regime_is_secure from get_phys_addr_lpae,
> using the new parameter instead.
>
> Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> @@ -2334,7 +2334,7 @@ bool get_phys_addr(CPUARMState *env, target_ulong
> address,
> memset(result, 0, sizeof(*result));
>
> ret = get_phys_addr_lpae(env, ipa, access_type, s2_mmu_idx,
> - is_el0, result, fi);
> + ipa_secure, is_el0, result, fi);
> fi->s2addr = ipa;
Depending on how we change patch 2, this may want to be looking at
something other than ipa_secure.
thanks
-- PMM
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [PATCH v2 17/66] target/arm: Add is_secure parameter to get_phys_addr_lpae,
Peter Maydell <=