[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] vhost: Not return fail while the device does not support sen
From: |
Jason Wang |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] vhost: Not return fail while the device does not support send_iotlb_msg |
Date: |
Thu, 1 Dec 2022 16:49:35 +0800 |
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 4:11 PM Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Some device does not support vhost_send_device_iotlb_msg()
> such as vDPA device, which is as expected. So we should not
> return fail here.
Please explain in which case you may hit the -ENODEV and what's the
side effect of this.
Thanks
>
> Signed-off-by: Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/virtio/vhost-backend.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-backend.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-backend.c
> index 8e581575c9..9321ed9031 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-backend.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-backend.c
> @@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ int vhost_backend_update_device_iotlb(struct vhost_dev
> *dev,
> if (dev->vhost_ops && dev->vhost_ops->vhost_send_device_iotlb_msg)
> return dev->vhost_ops->vhost_send_device_iotlb_msg(dev, &imsg);
>
> - return -ENODEV;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> int vhost_backend_invalidate_device_iotlb(struct vhost_dev *dev,
> @@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ int vhost_backend_invalidate_device_iotlb(struct
> vhost_dev *dev,
> if (dev->vhost_ops && dev->vhost_ops->vhost_send_device_iotlb_msg)
> return dev->vhost_ops->vhost_send_device_iotlb_msg(dev, &imsg);
>
> - return -ENODEV;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> int vhost_backend_handle_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev,
> --
> 2.34.3
>
- Re: [PATCH] vhost: Not return fail while the device does not support send_iotlb_msg,
Jason Wang <=