[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 2/2] io/channel-tls: fix handling of bigger read buffers
From: |
Daniel P . Berrangé |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 2/2] io/channel-tls: fix handling of bigger read buffers |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Dec 2022 10:55:55 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/2.2.7 (2022-08-07) |
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 11:38:03AM +0100, Antoine Damhet wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 10:52:20AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 03:23:29PM +0100, antoine.damhet@shadow.tech wrote:
> > > From: Antoine Damhet <antoine.damhet@shadow.tech>
> > >
> > > Since the TLS backend can read more data from the underlying QIOChannel
> > > we introduce a minimal child GSource to notify if we still have more
> > > data available to be read.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Antoine Damhet <antoine.damhet@shadow.tech>
> > > Signed-off-by: Charles Frey <charles.frey@shadow.tech>
> > > ---
> > > io/channel-tls.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Now that the 7.2.0 is released, can we hope to get this queued ? If not
> what should I do ?
Yes, I have this queued already for my next pull req.
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|