Re: [PATCH 2/2] tpm: add backend for mssim

[Stefan Berger]

On 12/16/22 09:29, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:

> All the objections you're raising are related to the current
> specifics of the implementation of the mssim remote server.
> While valid, this is of no concern to QEMU when deciding whether
> to require a migration blocker on the client side. This is 3rd
> party remote service that should be considered a black box from
> QEMU's POV. It is possible to write a remote server that supports
> the mssim network protocol, and has the ability to serialize
> its state. Whether such an impl exists today or not is separate.

Then let's document the scenarios so someone can repeat them, I think this is 
just fair. James said he tested state migration scenarios and it works, so 
let's enable others to do it as well. I am open to someone maintaining just 
this driver and the dynamics that may develop around it.

Regards,
   Stefan

> With regards,
> Daniel