[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Performance improvement with 81f730d4
From: |
Lukáš Doktor |
Subject: |
Performance improvement with 81f730d4 |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Apr 2023 08:02:28 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0 |
Hello Paolo,
the perf-ci detected and bisected the 81f730d4 - block, block-backend: write
some hot coroutine wrappers by hand - as a performance improvement with 4K
read/writes across various profiles. Without pinning it was about 10%, with
pinned qemu about 15%.
https://ldoktor.github.io/tmp/RedHat-virtlab722/v8.0.0/130-improvement.html
Based on the commit message I guess it's expected, so my question is whether I
should report such obvious improvements or only report improvements/regressions
that are not that obvious?
Regards,
Lukáš
OpenPGP_0x26B362E47FCF22C1.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Performance improvement with 81f730d4,
Lukáš Doktor <=