[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 01/16] target/riscv: skip features setup for KVM CPUs
From: |
Alistair Francis |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 01/16] target/riscv: skip features setup for KVM CPUs |
Date: |
Fri, 2 Jun 2023 14:17:33 +1000 |
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 5:49 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
<dbarboza@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> As it is today it's not possible to use '-cpu host' if the RISC-V host
> has RVH enabled. This is the resulting error:
>
> $ sudo ./qemu/build/qemu-system-riscv64 \
> -machine virt,accel=kvm -m 2G -smp 1 \
> -nographic -snapshot -kernel ./guest_imgs/Image \
> -initrd ./guest_imgs/rootfs_kvm_riscv64.img \
> -append "earlycon=sbi root=/dev/ram rw" \
> -cpu host
> qemu-system-riscv64: H extension requires priv spec 1.12.0
>
> This happens because we're checking for priv spec for all CPUs, and
> since we're not setting env->priv_ver for the 'host' CPU, it's being
> default to zero (i.e. PRIV_SPEC_1_10_0).
>
> In reality env->priv_ver does not make sense when running with the KVM
> 'host' CPU. It's used to gate certain CSRs/extensions during translation
> to make them unavailable if the hart declares an older spec version. It
> doesn't have any other use. E.g. OpenSBI version 1.2 retrieves the spec
> checking if the CSR_MCOUNTEREN, CSR_MCOUNTINHIBIT and CSR_MENVCFG CSRs
> are available [1].
>
> 'priv_ver' is just one example. We're doing a lot of feature validation
> and setup during riscv_cpu_realize() that it doesn't apply KVM CPUs.
> Validating the feature set for those CPUs is a KVM problem that should
> be handled in KVM specific code.
>
> The new riscv_cpu_realize_features() helper contains all validation
> logic that are not applicable to KVM CPUs. riscv_cpu_realize() verifies
> if we're dealing with a KVM CPU and, if not, execute the new helper to
> proceed with the usual realize() logic for all other CPUs.
>
> [1] lib/sbi/sbi_hart.c, hart_detect_features()
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Alistair
> ---
> target/riscv/cpu.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> index 938c7bd87b..72f5433776 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> @@ -331,6 +331,15 @@ static void set_satp_mode_default_map(RISCVCPU *cpu)
> }
> #endif
>
> +static bool riscv_running_KVM(void)
> +{
> +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> + return kvm_enabled();
> +#else
> + return false;
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> static void riscv_any_cpu_init(Object *obj)
> {
> RISCVCPU *cpu = RISCV_CPU(obj);
> @@ -1295,20 +1304,12 @@ static void
> riscv_cpu_validate_misa_priv(CPURISCVState *env, Error **errp)
> }
> }
>
> -static void riscv_cpu_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> +static void riscv_cpu_realize_features(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> {
> - CPUState *cs = CPU(dev);
> RISCVCPU *cpu = RISCV_CPU(dev);
> CPURISCVState *env = &cpu->env;
> - RISCVCPUClass *mcc = RISCV_CPU_GET_CLASS(dev);
> Error *local_err = NULL;
>
> - cpu_exec_realizefn(cs, &local_err);
> - if (local_err != NULL) {
> - error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> - return;
> - }
> -
> riscv_cpu_validate_misa_mxl(cpu, &local_err);
> if (local_err != NULL) {
> error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> @@ -1354,6 +1355,28 @@ static void riscv_cpu_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error
> **errp)
> }
> }
> #endif
> +}
> +
> +static void riscv_cpu_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> +{
> + CPUState *cs = CPU(dev);
> + RISCVCPU *cpu = RISCV_CPU(dev);
> + RISCVCPUClass *mcc = RISCV_CPU_GET_CLASS(dev);
> + Error *local_err = NULL;
> +
> + cpu_exec_realizefn(cs, &local_err);
> + if (local_err != NULL) {
> + error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (!riscv_running_KVM()) {
> + riscv_cpu_realize_features(dev, &local_err);
> + if (local_err != NULL) {
> + error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> + return;
> + }
> + }
>
> riscv_cpu_finalize_features(cpu, &local_err);
> if (local_err != NULL) {
> --
> 2.40.1
>
>
- Re: [PATCH 01/16] target/riscv: skip features setup for KVM CPUs,
Alistair Francis <=