[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 1/2] target/riscv: Check for CF_PARALLEL instead of qemu_tcg_
From: |
Alex Bennée |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 1/2] target/riscv: Check for CF_PARALLEL instead of qemu_tcg_mttcg_enabled |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Jun 2023 17:26:59 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.11.7; emacs 29.0.92 |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> writes:
> A CPU knows whether MTTCG is enabled or not because it is
> reflected in its TCG flags via the CF_PARALLEL bit.
>
> Suggested-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> ---
> target/riscv/cpu.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> index 4035fe0e62..4dfa64af6a 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> @@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ static void rv64_veyron_v1_cpu_init(Object *obj)
>
> static void rv128_base_cpu_init(Object *obj)
> {
> - if (qemu_tcg_mttcg_enabled()) {
> + if (CPU(obj)->tcg_cflags & CF_PARALLEL) {
Hmm have you checked that tcg_cpu_init_cflags() has executed by this point?
> /* Missing 128-bit aligned atomics */
> error_report("128-bit RISC-V currently does not work with Multi "
> "Threaded TCG. Please use: -accel tcg,thread=single");
Not that we can do anything about it but in linux-user we start with
CF_PARALLEL unset and only set it at the point we spawn a new thread.
--
Alex Bennée
Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro