qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 00/26] Migration PULL 2023-07-24


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/26] Migration PULL 2023-07-24
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 15:28:47 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0

On 24/07/2023 15.06, Juan Quintela wrote:
Hi

This is the migration PULL request.

Maybe it would better to use "PULL" instead of "PATCH" in the subject?

Now a not on CI, thas has been really bad.  After too many problems
with last PULLS, I decided to learn to use qemu CI.  On one hand, it
is not so difficult, even I can use it O:-)

On the other hand, the amount of problems that I got is inmense.  Some
of them dissapear when I rerun the checks, but I never know if it is
my PULL request, the CI system or the tests themselves.

I normally peek at https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/pipelines to see whether the problem occurred in one of the last staging CI runs already ... or I push the master branch to my own repo to see whether it reproduces with a clean state. That often helps in judging whether it's a new problem or a pre-existing one.

This (last) patch is not part of the PULL request, but I have found
that it _always_ makes gcov fail.  I had to use bisect to find where
the problem was.

https://gitlab.com/juan.quintela/qemu/-/jobs/4571878922

I could use help to know how a change in test/qtest/migration-test.c
can break block layer tests, I am all ears.

Yes, I tried several times.  It always fails on that patch.  The
passes with flying colors.

Can you reproduce it locally by running "make check-block"?

The tests/qemu-iotests/tests/copy-before-write test seems to be doing some things with snapshots ... maybe that's related?

 Thomas




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]