|
From: | Thomas Huth |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH 00/26] Migration PULL 2023-07-24 |
Date: | Mon, 24 Jul 2023 15:28:47 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0 |
On 24/07/2023 15.06, Juan Quintela wrote:
Hi This is the migration PULL request.
Maybe it would better to use "PULL" instead of "PATCH" in the subject?
Now a not on CI, thas has been really bad. After too many problems with last PULLS, I decided to learn to use qemu CI. On one hand, it is not so difficult, even I can use it O:-) On the other hand, the amount of problems that I got is inmense. Some of them dissapear when I rerun the checks, but I never know if it is my PULL request, the CI system or the tests themselves.
I normally peek at https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/pipelines to see whether the problem occurred in one of the last staging CI runs already ... or I push the master branch to my own repo to see whether it reproduces with a clean state. That often helps in judging whether it's a new problem or a pre-existing one.
This (last) patch is not part of the PULL request, but I have found that it _always_ makes gcov fail. I had to use bisect to find where the problem was. https://gitlab.com/juan.quintela/qemu/-/jobs/4571878922 I could use help to know how a change in test/qtest/migration-test.c can break block layer tests, I am all ears. Yes, I tried several times. It always fails on that patch. The passes with flying colors.
Can you reproduce it locally by running "make check-block"?The tests/qemu-iotests/tests/copy-before-write test seems to be doing some things with snapshots ... maybe that's related?
Thomas
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |