[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2] qapi: provide a friendly string representation of QAPI cl
|
From: |
Daniel P . Berrangé |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2] qapi: provide a friendly string representation of QAPI classes |
|
Date: |
Wed, 18 Oct 2023 12:05:08 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/2.2.9 (2022-11-12) |
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 12:54:28PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > If printing a QAPI schema object for debugging we get the classname and
> > a hex value for the instance:
> >
> > <qapi.schema.QAPISchemaEnumType object at 0x7f0ab4c2dad0>
> > <qapi.schema.QAPISchemaObjectType object at 0x7f0ab4c2dd90>
> > <qapi.schema.QAPISchemaArrayType object at 0x7f0ab4c2df90>
> >
> > With this change we instead get the classname and the human friendly
> > name of the QAPI type instance:
> >
> > <QAPISchemaEnumType:CpuS390State>
> > <QAPISchemaObjectType:CpuInfoS390>
> > <QAPISchemaArrayType:CpuInfoFastList>
>
> This gains the QAPI name (good), but loses the address. The actual
> address is rarely useful (when it is, you're deep in Python innards;
> good luck, you'll need it). Except they let me see which objects are
> the same, and which are different. Could that be preserved without
> trouble somehow?
It appears the hex value comes from 'id(obj)', so yes, I can
insert the same hex value into the new representation.
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >
> > v1 was two & half years ago:
> >
> > https://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-03/msg01645.html
>
> Was it my fault? If yes, I apologize.
No, I forgot about it until I was moving old branches from my previous
laptop to my new laptops :-)
>
> > scripts/qapi/schema.py | 6 ++++++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/scripts/qapi/schema.py b/scripts/qapi/schema.py
> > index 231ebf61ba..20ffacbdf0 100644
> > --- a/scripts/qapi/schema.py
> > +++ b/scripts/qapi/schema.py
> > @@ -73,6 +73,12 @@ def __init__(self, name: str, info, doc, ifcond=None,
> > features=None):
> > self.features = features or []
> > self._checked = False
> >
> > + def __repr__(self):
> > + if self.name is not None:
> > + return "<%s:%s>" % (type(self).__name__, self.name)
> > + else:
> > + return "<%s>" % type(self).__name__
> > +
> > def c_name(self):
> > return c_name(self.name)
>
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|