Re: [RFC PATCH-for-8.2] .gitlab-ci.d/cirrus.yml: Promote NetBSD job as gating

[Reinoud Zandijk]

On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 06:15:51PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 09/11/2023 17.58, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 04:35:56PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > > On 9/11/23 16:35, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > > > This Cirrus-CI based job takes ~12min, similarly to macOS job.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> > > > ---
> > > > Based-on: <20231109150900.91186-1-philmd@linaro.org>
> > > >             "tests/vm/netbsd: Use Python v3.11"
> > > > ---
> > > >    .gitlab-ci.d/cirrus.yml | 3 +--
> > > >    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/.gitlab-ci.d/cirrus.yml b/.gitlab-ci.d/cirrus.yml
> > > > index e7f1f83c2c..7b01acb104 100644
> > > > --- a/.gitlab-ci.d/cirrus.yml
> > > > +++ b/.gitlab-ci.d/cirrus.yml
> > > > @@ -94,8 +94,6 @@ aarch64-macos-12-base-build:
> > > >        - cirrus-run -v --show-build-log always 
> > > > .gitlab-ci.d/cirrus/$NAME.yml
> > > >      variables:
> > > >        QEMU_JOB_CIRRUS: 1
> > > > -    QEMU_JOB_OPTIONAL: 1
> > > > -
> > > >    x86-netbsd:
> > > >      extends: .cirrus_kvm_job
> > > > @@ -110,3 +108,4 @@ x86-openbsd:
> > > >        NAME: openbsd
> > > >        CONFIGURE_ARGS: 
> > > > --target-list=i386-softmmu,riscv64-softmmu,mips64-softmmu
> > > >        TEST_TARGETS: check
> > > > +    QEMU_JOB_OPTIONAL: 1
> > > 
> > > BTW OpenBSD works for me, but takes ~20min (similar to the FreeBSD job).
> ...
> > I could have sworn our cirrus jobs were much slower in the past (around
> > the 40 min mark), as we had to cut down what we were running to avoid
> > frequent timeouts.
> 
> You're right, Daniel. Seems like both, the Cirrus netbsd and the openbsd job
> are currently broken and only output some help text instead of compiling
> QEMU:
> 
>  https://gitlab.com/philmd/qemu/-/jobs/5497861511#L6834
> 
> ... that's why the finish so fast.
> 
> IIRC last time I've seen them "working", they were running into the 80
> minute timeout again.
> 
> So the netbsd and openbsd job are indeed not very useful anymore. I think we
> should rather remove them and add a proper job via our own custom
> KVM-capable runners instead.

Even though I am a co-maintainer of the NetBSD support for Qemu I am not quite
sure what testcase this is. Is this a regression test of installing NetBSD
from an ISO? That somehow times out? Where can I find the resulting console
output? Maybe the installer changed?

With regards,
Reinoud