[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] hw/i386: fix short-circuit logic with non-optimizing builds
|
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] hw/i386: fix short-circuit logic with non-optimizing builds |
|
Date: |
Sun, 19 Nov 2023 02:23:00 -0500 |
On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 10:25:31AM -0800, Daniel Hoffman wrote:
> `kvm_enabled()` is compiled down to `0` and short-circuit logic is
> used to remmove references to undefined symbols at the compile stage.
> Some build configurations with some compilers don't attempt to
> simplify this logic down in some cases (the pattern appears to be
> that the literal false must be the first term) and this was causing
> some builds to emit references to undefined symbols.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Hoffman <dhoff749@gmail.com>
Could we add a bit more detail here? Will help make sure
this does not break again in the future.
> ---
> hw/i386/x86.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/x86.c b/hw/i386/x86.c
> index b3d054889bb..d339c8f3ef8 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/x86.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/x86.c
> @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ void x86_cpus_init(X86MachineState *x86ms, int
> default_cpu_version)
> * Can we support APIC ID 255 or higher? With KVM, that requires
> * both in-kernel lapic and X2APIC userspace API.
> */
> - if (x86ms->apic_id_limit > 255 && kvm_enabled() &&
> + if (kvm_enabled() && x86ms->apic_id_limit > 255 &&
> (!kvm_irqchip_in_kernel() || !kvm_enable_x2apic())) {
> error_report("current -smp configuration requires kernel "
> "irqchip and X2APIC API support.");
> @@ -418,8 +418,8 @@ void x86_cpu_pre_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
> }
> cpu->thread_id = topo_ids.smt_id;
>
> - if (hyperv_feat_enabled(cpu, HYPERV_FEAT_VPINDEX) &&
> - kvm_enabled() && !kvm_hv_vpindex_settable()) {
> + if (kvm_enabled() && hyperv_feat_enabled(cpu, HYPERV_FEAT_VPINDEX) &&
> + !kvm_hv_vpindex_settable()) {
> error_setg(errp, "kernel doesn't allow setting HyperV VP_INDEX");
> return;
> }
> --
> 2.40.1