[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [PULL v2 25/30] Hexagon HVX (target/hexagon) instruction decoding
|
From: |
Brian Cain |
|
Subject: |
RE: [PULL v2 25/30] Hexagon HVX (target/hexagon) instruction decoding |
|
Date: |
Tue, 21 Nov 2023 15:51:42 +0000 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: qemu-devel-bounces+bcain=quicinc.com@nongnu.org <qemu-devel-
> bounces+bcain=quicinc.com@nongnu.org> On Behalf Of Peter Maydell
> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2023 8:33 AM
> To: Taylor Simpson <tsimpson@quicinc.com>
> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; richard.henderson@linaro.org; f4bug@amsat.org
> Subject: Re: [PULL v2 25/30] Hexagon HVX (target/hexagon) instruction
> decoding
>
> WARNING: This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of
> any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.
>
> On Wed, 3 Nov 2021 at 21:17, Taylor Simpson <tsimpson@quicinc.com> wrote:
> >
> > Add new file to target/hexagon/meson.build
> >
> > Acked-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Taylor Simpson <tsimpson@quicinc.com>
>
> Hi; Coverity points out a variable written to and then
> overwritten before it's ever used in this function (CID 1527408):
>
>
>
>
> > +static void
> > +check_new_value(Packet *pkt)
> > +{
> > + /* .new value for a MMVector store */
> > + int i, j;
> > + const char *reginfo;
> > + const char *destletters;
> > + const char *dststr = NULL;
> > + uint16_t def_opcode;
> > + char letter;
> > + int def_regnum;
>
> def_regnum has function level scope...
>
> > +
> > + for (i = 1; i < pkt->num_insns; i++) {
> > + uint16_t use_opcode = pkt->insn[i].opcode;
> > + if (GET_ATTRIB(use_opcode, A_DOTNEWVALUE) &&
> > + GET_ATTRIB(use_opcode, A_CVI) &&
> > + GET_ATTRIB(use_opcode, A_STORE)) {
> > + int use_regidx = strchr(opcode_reginfo[use_opcode], 's') -
> > + opcode_reginfo[use_opcode];
> > + /*
> > + * What's encoded at the N-field is the offset to who's
> > producing
> > + * the value.
> > + * Shift off the LSB which indicates odd/even register.
> > + */
> > + int def_off = ((pkt->insn[i].regno[use_regidx]) >> 1);
> > + int def_oreg = pkt->insn[i].regno[use_regidx] & 1;
> > + int def_idx = -1;
> > + for (j = i - 1; (j >= 0) && (def_off >= 0); j--) {
> > + if (!GET_ATTRIB(pkt->insn[j].opcode, A_CVI)) {
> > + continue;
> > + }
> > + def_off--;
> > + if (def_off == 0) {
> > + def_idx = j;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + /*
> > + * Check for a badly encoded N-field which points to an
> > instruction
> > + * out-of-range
> > + */
> > + g_assert(!((def_off != 0) || (def_idx < 0) ||
> > + (def_idx > (pkt->num_insns - 1))));
> > +
> > + /* def_idx is the index of the producer */
> > + def_opcode = pkt->insn[def_idx].opcode;
> > + reginfo = opcode_reginfo[def_opcode];
> > + destletters = "dexy";
> > + for (j = 0; (letter = destletters[j]) != 0; j++) {
> > + dststr = strchr(reginfo, letter);
> > + if (dststr != NULL) {
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + if ((dststr == NULL) && GET_ATTRIB(def_opcode, A_CVI_GATHER))
> > {
> > + def_regnum = 0;
>
> In this half of the if() we set it to 0...
>
> > + pkt->insn[i].regno[use_regidx] = def_oreg;
> > + pkt->insn[i].new_value_producer_slot =
> > pkt->insn[def_idx].slot;
> > + } else {
> > + if (dststr == NULL) {
> > + /* still not there, we have a bad packet */
> > + g_assert_not_reached();
> > + }
> > + def_regnum = pkt->insn[def_idx].regno[dststr - reginfo];
> > + /* Now patch up the consumer with the register number */
> > + pkt->insn[i].regno[use_regidx] = def_regnum ^ def_oreg;
> > + /* special case for (Vx,Vy) */
> > + dststr = strchr(reginfo, 'y');
> > + if (def_oreg && strchr(reginfo, 'x') && dststr) {
> > + def_regnum = pkt->insn[def_idx].regno[dststr -
> > reginfo];
> > + pkt->insn[i].regno[use_regidx] = def_regnum;
> > + }
>
> ...but the only place we read def_regnum is in this other half of the
> if(), and if we get here then we've set it to something out of pxt->insn.
>
> Were we supposed to do something with def_regnum outside this if(),
> or could we instead drop the initialization in the first half of the if()
> and move its declaration inside this else {} block ?
Hmm -- we'll take a look at this and get back to you.
> > + /*
> > + * We need to remember who produces this value to later
> > + * check if it was dynamically cancelled
> > + */
> > + pkt->insn[i].new_value_producer_slot =
> > pkt->insn[def_idx].slot;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + }
> > +}
>
> thanks
> -- PMM