Re: [PATCH 2/2] docs: define policy forbidding use of "AI" / LLM code generators

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 04:56:28PM +0200, Manos Pitsidianakis wrote:
> > However, can't we define a simpler more specific policy?
> > For example, isn't it true that *any* automatically generated code
> > can only be included if the scripts producing said code
> > are also included or otherwise available under GPLv2?
> 
> The following definition makes sense to me:
> 
> - Automated codegen tool must be idempotent.
> - Automated codegen tool must not use statistical modelling.

Why does it matter so much?

> I'd remove all AI or LLM references. These are non-specific, colloquial and
> in the case of `AI`, non-technical. This policy should apply the same to a
> Markov chain code generator.

-- 
MST