Re: [PATCH 2/2] docs: define policy forbidding use of "AI" / LLM code generators

[Daniel P . Berrangé]

On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 10:43:05AM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 at 10:42, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 10:33:49AM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote:
> > > That probably means we can never use even open source LLMs to generate
> > > code for QEMU because while the source data is all open source it won't
> > > necessarily be GPL compatible.
> >
> > I would probably wait until the dust settles before we start accepting
> > LLM generated code.
> 
> I think that's pretty much my take on what this policy is:
> "say no for now; we can always come back later when the legal
> situation seems clearer".

Yes, that was my thoughts exactly.

And if anyone comes along with a specific LLM/AI code generator that
they believe can be used in a way compatible with the DCO, they can
ask for an exception to the general policy which we can discuss then.

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|