[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] target/riscv: Enable updates for pointer masking vari
From: |
Alistair Francis |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] target/riscv: Enable updates for pointer masking variables and thus enable pointer masking extension |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Jan 2024 10:33:52 +1000 |
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 5:23 PM Alexey Baturo <baturo.alexey@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I might be wrong here, but right now J in MISA is unused.
I suspect you are right, it would be worth confirming though.
> I think the J-letter extension is still a thing, but current extensions like
> Zjpm and Zjid follow the Z ext scheme.
> Do you think it should be removed?
It sounds like it should be removed then
Alistair
>
>
> пт, 5 янв. 2024 г. в 08:28, Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com>:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 4:58 AM Alexey Baturo <baturo.alexey@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > From: Alexey Baturo <baturo.alexey@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Alexey Baturo <baturo.alexey@gmail.com>
>> > ---
>> > target/riscv/cpu.c | 8 ++++++++
>> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
>> > index 1e6571ce99..13389ddc55 100644
>> > --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
>> > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
>> > @@ -153,6 +153,9 @@ const RISCVIsaExtData isa_edata_arr[] = {
>> > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svinval, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svinval),
>> > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svnapot, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svnapot),
>> > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svpbmt, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svpbmt),
>> > + ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(ssnpm, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_ssnpm),
>> > + ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(smnpm, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_smnpm),
>> > + ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(smmpm, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_smmpm),
>> > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(xtheadba, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0, ext_xtheadba),
>> > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(xtheadbb, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0, ext_xtheadbb),
>> > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(xtheadbs, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0, ext_xtheadbs),
>> > @@ -1337,6 +1340,11 @@ const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_extensions[]
>> > = {
>> >
>> > MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zmmul", ext_zmmul, false),
>> >
>> > + /* Zjpm v0.8 extensions */
>> > + MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("ssnpm", ext_ssnpm, false),
>> > + MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("smnpm", ext_smnpm, false),
>> > + MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("smmpm", ext_smmpm, false),
>>
>> What happens to the existing J property?
>>
>>
>> Alistair
>>
>> > +
>> > MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zca", ext_zca, false),
>> > MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zcb", ext_zcb, false),
>> > MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zcd", ext_zcd, false),
>> > --
>> > 2.34.1
>> >
>> >
[PATCH v3 5/6] target/riscv: Update address modify functions to take into account pointer masking, Alexey Baturo, 2024/01/03