[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH 86/88] esp.c: keep track of the DRQ state during DMA
From: |
Mark Cave-Ayland |
Subject: |
[PATCH 86/88] esp.c: keep track of the DRQ state during DMA |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Jan 2024 12:54:18 +0000 |
Currently the DRQ IRQ is updated every time DMA data is sent/received which
is both inefficient and causes excessive logging of the DRQ state. Add a
new drq_state bool that only updates the DRQ IRQ if its state changes.
This commit adds the new drq_state bool to the migration state: since the
version number has already been increased earlier in the series, there is
no need to repeat it again here. The DRQ IRQ is (currently) only used for
PDMA transfers which already have a migration break in this series so
there are no problems setting its value post-load.
Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>
---
hw/scsi/esp.c | 15 +++++++++++----
include/hw/scsi/esp.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/scsi/esp.c b/hw/scsi/esp.c
index fb68606f00..04615d8b5f 100644
--- a/hw/scsi/esp.c
+++ b/hw/scsi/esp.c
@@ -62,14 +62,20 @@ static void esp_lower_irq(ESPState *s)
static void esp_raise_drq(ESPState *s)
{
- qemu_irq_raise(s->drq_irq);
- trace_esp_raise_drq();
+ if (!(s->drq_state)) {
+ qemu_irq_raise(s->drq_irq);
+ trace_esp_raise_drq();
+ s->drq_state = true;
+ }
}
static void esp_lower_drq(ESPState *s)
{
- qemu_irq_lower(s->drq_irq);
- trace_esp_lower_drq();
+ if (s->drq_state) {
+ qemu_irq_lower(s->drq_irq);
+ trace_esp_lower_drq();
+ s->drq_state = false;
+ }
}
void esp_dma_enable(ESPState *s, int irq, int level)
@@ -1358,6 +1364,7 @@ const VMStateDescription vmstate_esp = {
VMSTATE_UINT8_TEST(mig_ti_cmd, ESPState,
esp_is_between_version_5_and_6),
VMSTATE_UINT8_TEST(lun, ESPState, esp_is_version_6),
+ VMSTATE_BOOL(drq_state, ESPState),
VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
},
};
diff --git a/include/hw/scsi/esp.h b/include/hw/scsi/esp.h
index c6e8b64e20..533d856aa3 100644
--- a/include/hw/scsi/esp.h
+++ b/include/hw/scsi/esp.h
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ struct ESPState {
uint8_t wregs[ESP_REGS];
qemu_irq irq;
qemu_irq drq_irq;
+ bool drq_state;
uint8_t chip_id;
bool tchi_written;
int32_t ti_size;
--
2.39.2
- [PATCH 53/88] esp.c: replace do_dma_pdma_cb() with esp_do_dma(), (continued)
- [PATCH 53/88] esp.c: replace do_dma_pdma_cb() with esp_do_dma(), Mark Cave-Ayland, 2024/01/12
- [PATCH 58/88] esp.c: separate logic based upon ESP command in esp_command_complete(), Mark Cave-Ayland, 2024/01/12
- [PATCH 61/88] esp.c: remove DATA IN phase logic when reading from FIFO, Mark Cave-Ayland, 2024/01/12
- [PATCH 77/88] esp.c: only transfer non-DMA MESSAGE OUT phase data for specific commands, Mark Cave-Ayland, 2024/01/12
- [PATCH 62/88] esp.c: zero command register when TI command terminates due to phase change, Mark Cave-Ayland, 2024/01/12
- [PATCH 63/88] esp.c: remove unneeded ti_cmd field, Mark Cave-Ayland, 2024/01/12
- [PATCH 82/88] esp.c: consolidate DMA and PDMA logic in STATUS and MESSAGE IN phases, Mark Cave-Ayland, 2024/01/12
- [PATCH 69/88] esp.c: consolidate end of command sequence after ICCS command, Mark Cave-Ayland, 2024/01/12
- [PATCH 52/88] esp.c: move CMD_SELATNS end of command logic to esp_do_dma() and do_dma_pdma_cb(), Mark Cave-Ayland, 2024/01/12
- [PATCH 68/88] esp.c: move write_response() non-DMA logic to esp_do_nodma(), Mark Cave-Ayland, 2024/01/12
- [PATCH 86/88] esp.c: keep track of the DRQ state during DMA,
Mark Cave-Ayland <=
- [PATCH 88/88] esp.c: add my copyright to the file, Mark Cave-Ayland, 2024/01/12
- [PATCH 60/88] esp.c: use deferred interrupts for both DATA IN and DATA OUT phases, Mark Cave-Ayland, 2024/01/12
- [PATCH 85/88] esp.c: rename irq_data IRQ to drq_irq, Mark Cave-Ayland, 2024/01/12
- [PATCH 83/88] esp.c: replace n variable with len in esp_do_nodma(), Mark Cave-Ayland, 2024/01/12
- [PATCH 67/88] esp.c: replace get_cmd() with esp_do_nodma(), Mark Cave-Ayland, 2024/01/12
- [PATCH 87/88] esp.c: switch TypeInfo registration to use DEFINE_TYPES() macro, Mark Cave-Ayland, 2024/01/12
- Re: [PATCH 00/88] esp: rework ESP emulation to use a SCSI phase-based state machine, Mark Cave-Ayland, 2024/01/22
- Re: [PATCH 00/88] esp: rework ESP emulation to use a SCSI phase-based state machine, Thomas Huth, 2024/01/25