Re: [PATCH v15 0/9] rutabaga_gfx + gfxstream

[Gurchetan Singh]

On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 2:42 AM Alyssa Ross <hi@alyssa.is> wrote:
>
> Hi Gurchetan,
>
> Gurchetan Singh <gurchetansingh@chromium.org> writes:
>
> > - As mentioned in v14:
> >     * AEMU: d6e6b99 "Delete VpxFrameParser.cpp"
> >     * gfxstream: 2131f78d Merge "gfxstream: add egl & gles deps.."
> >
> > are the proposed v.0.1.2 release points.  If those commits are sufficient
> > for packaging AEMU + gfxstream, let me know and I'll have official release
> > tags made.  If additional changes are required for packaging, let me know
> > as well.
>
> Were these releases ever made?

Thanks for the reminder.  I did make a request to create the release
tags, but changes were requested by Fedora packaging effort:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242058
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241701

So the request was canceled, but never re-requested.  I'll fire off
another request, with:

gfxstream: 23d05703b94035ac045df60823fb1fc4be0fdf1c ("gfxstream:
manually add debug logic")
AEMU: dd8b929c247ce9872c775e0e5ddc4300011d0e82 ("aemu: improve licensing")

as the commits.  These match the Fedora requests, and the AEMU one has
been merged into Fedora already it seems.

>
>
> The gfxstream ref mentioned here isn't compatible with
> v0.1.2-rutabaga-release, because it no longer provides logging_base.pc,
> and this email is the last mention I can find of these releases.
>
> In Nixpkgs, I've gone for packaging gfxstream and aemu with your initial
> proposed release points, which works fine, but it would be great to have
> this clearer upstream.