qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] target/arm: Move initialization of debug ID registers


From: Gustavo Romero
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] target/arm: Move initialization of debug ID registers
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 15:13:18 -0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0

Hi Peter!

On 6/24/24 10:26 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 15:39, Gustavo Romero <gustavo.romero@linaro.org> wrote:

Move the initialization of the debug ID registers to aa32_max_features,
which is used to set the 32-bit ID registers. This ensures that the
debug ID registers are consistently set for the max CPU in a single
place.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo Romero <gustavo.romero@linaro.org>
---
  target/arm/cpu.h       |  2 ++
  target/arm/tcg/cpu32.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
  target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c |  2 +-
  3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
index 3841359d0f..d8eb986a04 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.h
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
@@ -2299,6 +2299,8 @@ FIELD(DBGDEVID, DOUBLELOCK, 20, 4)
  FIELD(DBGDEVID, AUXREGS, 24, 4)
  FIELD(DBGDEVID, CIDMASK, 28, 4)

+FIELD(DBGDEVID1, PCSROFFSET, 0, 4)
+
  FIELD(MVFR0, SIMDREG, 0, 4)
  FIELD(MVFR0, FPSP, 4, 4)
  FIELD(MVFR0, FPDP, 8, 4)
diff --git a/target/arm/tcg/cpu32.c b/target/arm/tcg/cpu32.c
index bdd82d912a..b155a0136f 100644
--- a/target/arm/tcg/cpu32.c
+++ b/target/arm/tcg/cpu32.c
@@ -87,6 +87,33 @@ void aa32_max_features(ARMCPU *cpu)
      t = FIELD_DP32(t, ID_DFR0, PERFMON, 6);       /* FEAT_PMUv3p5 */
      cpu->isar.id_dfr0 = t;

+    /* Debug ID registers. */
+
+    /* Bit[15] is RES1, Bit[13] and Bits[11:0] are RES0. */
+    t = 0x00008000;
+    t = FIELD_DP32(t, DBGDIDR, SE_IMP, 1);
+    t = FIELD_DP32(t, DBGDIDR, NSUHD_IMP, 1);
+    t = FIELD_DP32(t, DBGDIDR, VERSION, 6);       /* Armv8 debug */
+    t = FIELD_DP32(t, DBGDIDR, CTX_CMPS, 1);
+    t = FIELD_DP32(t, DBGDIDR, BRPS, 5);
+    t = FIELD_DP32(t, DBGDIDR, WRPS, 3);
+    cpu->isar.dbgdidr = t;
+
+    t = FIELD_DP32(t, DBGDEVID, PCSAMPLE, 3);

Looks like we should have an initial "t = something" ("t = 0")
before this line? Otherwise we start the DBGDEVID value
with the value of DBGDIDR.

I'm setting all the 32 bits here so there is no bit left from previous t value.

But I agree it's better to be explicit here for readability. Done in v3.


+    t = FIELD_DP32(t, DBGDEVID, WPADDRMASK, 1);
+    t = FIELD_DP32(t, DBGDEVID, BPADDRMASK, 15);
+    t = FIELD_DP32(t, DBGDEVID, VECTORCATCH, 0);
+    t = FIELD_DP32(t, DBGDEVID, VIRTEXTNS, 1);
+    t = FIELD_DP32(t, DBGDEVID, DOUBLELOCK, 1);
+    t = FIELD_DP32(t, DBGDEVID, AUXREGS, 0);
+    t = FIELD_DP32(t, DBGDEVID, CIDMASK, 0);
+    cpu->isar.dbgdevid = t;
+
+    /* Bits[31:4] are RES0. */
+    t = 0;
+    t = FIELD_DP32(t, DBGDEVID1, PCSROFFSET, 2);
+    cpu->isar.dbgdevid1 = t;
+
      t = cpu->isar.id_dfr1;
      t = FIELD_DP32(t, ID_DFR1, HPMN0, 1);         /* FEAT_HPMN0 */
      cpu->isar.id_dfr1 = t;
@@ -955,9 +982,6 @@ static void arm_max_initfn(Object *obj)
      cpu->isar.id_isar4 = 0x00011142;
      cpu->isar.id_isar5 = 0x00011121;
      cpu->isar.id_isar6 = 0;
-    cpu->isar.dbgdidr = 0x3516d000;
-    cpu->isar.dbgdevid = 0x00110f13;
-    cpu->isar.dbgdevid1 = 0x2;
      cpu->isar.reset_pmcr_el0 = 0x41013000;
      cpu->clidr = 0x0a200023;
      cpu->ccsidr[0] = 0x701fe00a; /* 32KB L1 dcache */
diff --git a/target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c b/target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c
index 0899251eef..71e1bfcd4e 100644
--- a/target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c
+++ b/target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c
@@ -1167,7 +1167,7 @@ void aarch64_max_tcg_initfn(Object *obj)

      t = cpu->isar.id_aa64isar2;
      t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64ISAR2, MOPS, 1);     /* FEAT_MOPS */
-    t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64ISAR2, BC, 1);      /* FEAT_HBC */
+    t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64ISAR2, BC, 1);       /* FEAT_HBC */
      t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64ISAR2, WFXT, 2);     /* FEAT_WFxT */
      cpu->isar.id_aa64isar2 = t;

This indent fixup is unrelated so should really be its own patch.

Got it. Done in v3 so.


Cheers,
Gustavo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]