qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 3/6] target/riscv: Correct SXL return value for RV32 in RV64


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] target/riscv: Correct SXL return value for RV32 in RV64 QEMU
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 17:10:11 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

Hi Tiancheng, Zhiwei,

On 1/7/24 05:37, LIU Zhiwei wrote:
From: TANG Tiancheng <tangtiancheng.ttc@alibaba-inc.com>

Ensure that riscv_cpu_sxl returns MXL_RV32 when runningRV32 in an
RV64 QEMU.

Signed-off-by: TANG Tiancheng <tangtiancheng.ttc@alibaba-inc.com>
Fixes: 05e6ca5e156 ("target/riscv: Ignore reserved bits in PTE for RV64")
Reviewed-by: Liu Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com>
---
  target/riscv/cpu.h | 5 ++++-
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
index 6fe0d712b4..36a712044a 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
@@ -668,8 +668,11 @@ static inline RISCVMXL riscv_cpu_sxl(CPURISCVState *env)
  #ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
      return env->misa_mxl;
  #else
-    return get_field(env->mstatus, MSTATUS64_SXL);
+    if (env->misa_mxl != MXL_RV32) {
+        return get_field(env->mstatus, MSTATUS64_SXL);
+    }
  #endif
+    return MXL_RV32;

Can we simplify the previous TARGET_RISCV32 ifdef'ry?

  }
  #endif




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]