Re: [BUG REPORT] cxl process in infinity loop

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 00:30:06 +0000
"Xingtao Yao (Fujitsu)" <yaoxt.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:

> Hi, all
> 
> When I did the cxl memory hot-plug test on QEMU, I accidentally connected 
> two memdev to the same downstream port, the command like below:
> 
> > -object memory-backend-ram,size=262144k,share=on,id=vmem0 \
> > -object memory-backend-ram,size=262144k,share=on,id=vmem1 \
> > -device pxb-cxl,bus_nr=12,bus=pcie.0,id=cxl.1 \
> > -device cxl-rp,port=0,bus=cxl.1,id=root_port0,chassis=0,slot=0 \
> > -device cxl-upstream,bus=root_port0,id=us0 \
> > -device cxl-downstream,port=0,bus=us0,id=swport00,chassis=0,slot=5 \
> > -device cxl-downstream,port=0,bus=us0,id=swport01,chassis=0,slot=7 \  
> same downstream port but has different slot!
> 
> > -device cxl-type3,bus=swport00,volatile-memdev=vmem0,id=cxl-vmem0 \
> > -device cxl-type3,bus=swport01,volatile-memdev=vmem1,id=cxl-vmem1 \
> > -M 
> > cxl-fmw.0.targets.0=cxl.1,cxl-fmw.0.size=64G,cxl-fmw.0.interleave-granularity=4k
> >  \  
> 
> There is no error occurred when vm start, but when I executed the “cxl list” 
> command to view
> the CXL objects info, the process can not end properly.

I'd be happy to look preventing this on QEMU side if you send one,
but in general there are are lots of ways to shoot yourself in the
foot with CXL and PCI device emulation in QEMU so I'm not going
to rush to solve this specific one.

Likewise, some hardening in kernel / userspace probably makes sense but
this is a non compliant switch so priority of a fix is probably fairly low.

Jonathan

> 
> Then I used strace to trace the process, I found that the process is in 
> infinity loop:
> # strace cxl list
> ......
> clock_nanosleep(CLOCK_REALTIME, 0, {tv_sec=0, tv_nsec=1000000}, NULL) = 0
> openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sys/bus/cxl/flush", O_WRONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 3
> write(3, "1\n\0", 3)                    = 3
> close(3)                                = 0
> access("/run/udev/queue", F_OK)         = 0
> clock_nanosleep(CLOCK_REALTIME, 0, {tv_sec=0, tv_nsec=1000000}, NULL) = 0
> openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sys/bus/cxl/flush", O_WRONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 3
> write(3, "1\n\0", 3)                    = 3
> close(3)                                = 0
> access("/run/udev/queue", F_OK)         = 0
> clock_nanosleep(CLOCK_REALTIME, 0, {tv_sec=0, tv_nsec=1000000}, NULL) = 0
> openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sys/bus/cxl/flush", O_WRONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 3
> write(3, "1\n\0", 3)                    = 3
> close(3)                                = 0
> access("/run/udev/queue", F_OK)         = 0
> clock_nanosleep(CLOCK_REALTIME, 0, {tv_sec=0, tv_nsec=1000000}, NULL) = 0
> openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sys/bus/cxl/flush", O_WRONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 3
> write(3, "1\n\0", 3)                    = 3
> close(3)                                = 0
> access("/run/udev/queue", F_OK)         = 0
> clock_nanosleep(CLOCK_REALTIME, 0, {tv_sec=0, tv_nsec=1000000}, NULL) = 0
> openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sys/bus/cxl/flush", O_WRONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 3
> write(3, "1\n\0", 3)                    = 3
> close(3)                                = 0
> access("/run/udev/queue", F_OK)         = 0
> clock_nanosleep(CLOCK_REALTIME, 0, {tv_sec=0, tv_nsec=1000000}, NULL) = 0
> openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sys/bus/cxl/flush", O_WRONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 3
> write(3, "1\n\0", 3)                    = 3
> close(3)                                = 0
> access("/run/udev/queue", F_OK)         = 0
> clock_nanosleep(CLOCK_REALTIME, 0, {tv_sec=0, tv_nsec=1000000}, NULL) = 0
> openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sys/bus/cxl/flush", O_WRONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 3
> write(3, "1\n\0", 3)                    = 3
> close(3)                                = 0
> access("/run/udev/queue", F_OK)         = 0
> clock_nanosleep(CLOCK_REALTIME, 0, {tv_sec=0, tv_nsec=1000000}, NULL) = 0
> openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sys/bus/cxl/flush", O_WRONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 3
> write(3, "1\n\0", 3)                    = 3
> close(3)                                = 0
> access("/run/udev/queue", F_OK)         = 0
> 
> [Environment]:
> linux: V6.10-rc3
> QEMU: V9.0.0
> ndctl: v79
> 
> I know this is because of the wrong use of the QEMU command, but I think we 
> should 
> be aware of this error in one of the QEMU, OS or ndctl side at least.
> 
> Thanks
> Xingtao