[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 0/2] target/arm: Fix unwind from dc zva and FEAT_MOPS
From: |
Ilya Leoshkevich |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 0/2] target/arm: Fix unwind from dc zva and FEAT_MOPS |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Jul 2024 19:24:21 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.50.4 (3.50.4-1.fc39) |
On Thu, 2024-07-04 at 14:48 -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 7/4/24 08:18, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > On 7/4/24 07:50, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2024-07-02 at 16:41 -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > > > While looking into Zoltan's attempt to speed up ppc64 DCBZ
> > > > (data cache block set to zero), I wondered what AArch64 was
> > > > doing differently. It turned out that Arm is the only user
> > > > of tlb_vaddr_to_host.
> > > >
> > > > None of the code sequences in use between AArch64, Power64 and
> > > > S390X
> > > > are 100% safe, with race conditions vs mmap et al, however,
> > > > AArch64
> > > > is the only one that will fail this single threaded test case.
> > > > Use
> > > > of these new functions fixes the race condition as well, though
> > > > I
> > > > have not yet touched the other guests.
> > > >
> > > > I thought about exposing accel/tcg/user-retaddr.h for direct
> > > > use
> > > > from the targets, but perhaps these wrappers are cleaner. RFC?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > r~
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Richard Henderson (2):
> > > > accel/tcg: Introduce memset_ra, memmove_ra
> > > > target/arm: Use memset_ra, memmove_ra in helper-a64.c
> > > >
> > > > include/exec/cpu_ldst.h | 40 ++++++++++++++++
> > > > accel/tcg/user-exec.c | 22 +++++++++
> > > > target/arm/tcg/helper-a64.c | 10 ++--
> > > > tests/tcg/multiarch/memset-fault.c | 77
> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 4 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > > create mode 100644 tests/tcg/multiarch/memset-fault.c
> > >
> > > This sounds good to me.
> > >
> > > I haven't debugged it, but I wonder why doesn't s390x fail here.
> > > For XC with src == dst, it does access_memset() ->
> > > do_access_memset()
> > > -> memset() without setting the RA. And I don't think that
> > > anything
> > > around it sets the RA either.
> >
> > s390x uses probe_access_flags, which verifies the page is mapped
> > and writable, and raises
> > the exception when it isn't. In contrast, for user-only,
> > tlb_vaddr_to_host *only*
> > performs the guest -> host address mapping, i.e. (addr +
> > guest_base).
>
> I should clarify: probe_access_flags verifies that the page is mapped
> *at that moment*,
> but does not take the mmap_lock. So the race is that the page can be
> unmapped by another
> thread after probe_access_flags and before the memset completes.
I see, thanks. I completely overlooked the access_prepare() calls.
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>