qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 09/13] target/ppc: Improve helper_dcbz for user-only


From: BALATON Zoltan
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/13] target/ppc: Improve helper_dcbz for user-only
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 14:25:58 +0200 (CEST)

On Tue, 9 Jul 2024, Richard Henderson wrote:
Mark the reserve_addr check unlikely.  Use tlb_vaddr_to_host
instead of probe_write, relying on the memset itself to test
for page writability.  Use set/clear_helper_retaddr so that
we can properly unwind on segfault.

With this, a trivial loop around guest memset will spend
nearly 50% of runtime within helper_dcbz and host memset.

Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
target/ppc/mem_helper.c | 14 ++++++++++----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/ppc/mem_helper.c b/target/ppc/mem_helper.c
index 24bae3b80c..fa4c4f9fa9 100644
--- a/target/ppc/mem_helper.c
+++ b/target/ppc/mem_helper.c
@@ -280,20 +280,26 @@ static void dcbz_common(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong 
addr,
    addr &= mask;

    /* Check reservation */
-    if ((env->reserve_addr & mask) == addr)  {
+    if (unlikely((env->reserve_addr & mask) == addr))  {
        env->reserve_addr = (target_ulong)-1ULL;
    }

    /* Try fast path translate */
+#ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
+    haddr = tlb_vaddr_to_host(env, addr, MMU_DATA_STORE, mmu_idx);
+#else
    haddr = probe_write(env, addr, dcbz_size, mmu_idx, retaddr);
-    if (haddr) {
-        memset(haddr, 0, dcbz_size);
-    } else {
+    if (unlikely(!haddr)) {
        /* Slow path */
        for (int i = 0; i < dcbz_size; i += 8) {
            cpu_stq_mmuidx_ra(env, addr + i, 0, mmu_idx, retaddr);
        }

Is a return needed here to only get to memset below when haddr != NULL?

Regards,
BALATON Zoltan

    }
+#endif
+
+    set_helper_retaddr(retaddr);
+    memset(haddr, 0, dcbz_size);
+    clear_helper_retaddr();
}

void helper_dcbz(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong addr, int mmu_idx)




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]