qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PATCH 3/6] virtio-iommu: Free [host_]resv_ranges on unset_iommu_devices


From: Eric Auger
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] virtio-iommu: Free [host_]resv_ranges on unset_iommu_devices
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 11:45:05 +0200

We are currently missing the deallocation of the [host_]resv_regions
in case of hot unplug. Also to make things more simple let's rule
out the case where multiple HostIOMMUDevices would be aliased and
attached to the same IOMMUDevice. This allows to remove the handling
of conflicting Host reserved regions. Anyway this is not properly
supported at guest kernel level. On hotunplug the reserved regions
are reset to the ones set by virtio-iommu property.

Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
---
 hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.c
index 2c54c0d976..2de41ab412 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.c
@@ -538,8 +538,6 @@ static int virtio_iommu_set_host_iova_ranges(VirtIOIOMMU 
*s, PCIBus *bus,
 {
     IOMMUPciBus *sbus = g_hash_table_lookup(s->as_by_busptr, bus);
     IOMMUDevice *sdev;
-    GList *current_ranges;
-    GList *l, *tmp, *new_ranges = NULL;
     int ret = -EINVAL;
 
     if (!sbus) {
@@ -553,33 +551,10 @@ static int virtio_iommu_set_host_iova_ranges(VirtIOIOMMU 
*s, PCIBus *bus,
         return ret;
     }
 
-    current_ranges = sdev->host_resv_ranges;
-
-    /* check that each new resv region is included in an existing one */
     if (sdev->host_resv_ranges) {
-        range_inverse_array(iova_ranges,
-                            &new_ranges,
-                            0, UINT64_MAX);
-
-        for (tmp = new_ranges; tmp; tmp = tmp->next) {
-            Range *newr = (Range *)tmp->data;
-            bool included = false;
-
-            for (l = current_ranges; l; l = l->next) {
-                Range * r = (Range *)l->data;
-
-                if (range_contains_range(r, newr)) {
-                    included = true;
-                    break;
-                }
-            }
-            if (!included) {
-                goto error;
-            }
-        }
-        /* all new reserved ranges are included in existing ones */
-        ret = 0;
-        goto out;
+        error_setg(errp, "%s virtio-iommu does not support aliased BDF",
+                   __func__);
+        return ret;
     }
 
     range_inverse_array(iova_ranges,
@@ -588,14 +563,31 @@ static int virtio_iommu_set_host_iova_ranges(VirtIOIOMMU 
*s, PCIBus *bus,
     rebuild_resv_regions(sdev);
 
     return 0;
-error:
-    error_setg(errp, "%s Conflicting host reserved ranges set!",
-               __func__);
-out:
-    g_list_free_full(new_ranges, g_free);
-    return ret;
 }
 
+static void virtio_iommu_unset_host_iova_ranges(VirtIOIOMMU *s, PCIBus *bus,
+                                                int devfn)
+{
+    IOMMUPciBus *sbus = g_hash_table_lookup(s->as_by_busptr, bus);
+    IOMMUDevice *sdev;
+
+    if (!sbus) {
+        return;
+    }
+
+    sdev = sbus->pbdev[devfn];
+    if (!sdev) {
+        return;
+    }
+
+    g_list_free_full(g_steal_pointer(&sdev->host_resv_ranges), g_free);
+    g_list_free_full(sdev->resv_regions, g_free);
+    sdev->host_resv_ranges = NULL;
+    sdev->resv_regions = NULL;
+    add_prop_resv_regions(sdev);
+}
+
+
 static bool check_page_size_mask(VirtIOIOMMU *viommu, uint64_t new_mask,
                                  Error **errp)
 {
@@ -704,6 +696,8 @@ virtio_iommu_unset_iommu_device(PCIBus *bus, void *opaque, 
int devfn)
     if (!hiod) {
         return;
     }
+    virtio_iommu_unset_host_iova_ranges(viommu, hiod->aliased_bus,
+                                        hiod->aliased_devfn);
 
     g_hash_table_remove(viommu->host_iommu_devices, &key);
 }
-- 
2.41.0




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]