Re: [PATCH v5] virtio-pci: Fix the use of an uninitialized irqfd

[Jason Wang]

Hi Cindy

On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 1:25 PM Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> The crash was reported in MAC OS and NixOS, here is the link for this bug
> https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2334
> https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2321
>
> In this bug, they are using the virtio_input device. The guest notifier was
> not supported for this device, The function virtio_pci_set_guest_notifiers()
> was not called, and the vector_irqfd was not initialized.
>
> So the fix is adding the check for vector_irqfd in virtio_pci_get_notifier()
>
> But The function virtio_pci_get_notifier(),it can also be used in all kinds 
> of device.
> If the vector_irqfd still didn't initial after the VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK 
> is set
> means this device is not using guest notifier. We can let the check fail here
>
> This fix is verified in vyatta,MacOS,NixOS,fedora system.
>
> The bt tree for this bug is:
> Thread 6 "CPU 0/KVM" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> [Switching to Thread 0x7c817be006c0 (LWP 1269146)]
> kvm_virtio_pci_vq_vector_use () at ../qemu-9.0.0/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c:817
> 817         if (irqfd->users == 0) {
> (gdb) thread apply all bt
> ...
> Thread 6 (Thread 0x7c817be006c0 (LWP 1269146) "CPU 0/KVM"):
> 0  kvm_virtio_pci_vq_vector_use () at ../qemu-9.0.0/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c:817
> 1  kvm_virtio_pci_vector_use_one () at 
> ../qemu-9.0.0/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c:893
> 2  0x00005983657045e2 in memory_region_write_accessor () at 
> ../qemu-9.0.0/system/memory.c:497
> 3  0x0000598365704ba6 in access_with_adjusted_size () at 
> ../qemu-9.0.0/system/memory.c:573
> 4  0x0000598365705059 in memory_region_dispatch_write () at 
> ../qemu-9.0.0/system/memory.c:1528
> 5  0x00005983659b8e1f in flatview_write_continue_step.isra.0 () at 
> ../qemu-9.0.0/system/physmem.c:2713
> 6  0x000059836570ba7d in flatview_write_continue () at 
> ../qemu-9.0.0/system/physmem.c:2743
> 7  flatview_write () at ../qemu-9.0.0/system/physmem.c:2774
> 8  0x000059836570bb76 in address_space_write () at 
> ../qemu-9.0.0/system/physmem.c:2894
> 9  0x0000598365763afe in address_space_rw () at 
> ../qemu-9.0.0/system/physmem.c:2904
> 10 kvm_cpu_exec () at ../qemu-9.0.0/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c:2917
> 11 0x000059836576656e in kvm_vcpu_thread_fn () at 
> ../qemu-9.0.0/accel/kvm/kvm-accel-ops.c:50
> 12 0x0000598365926ca8 in qemu_thread_start () at 
> ../qemu-9.0.0/util/qemu-thread-posix.c:541
> 13 0x00007c8185bcd1cf in ??? () at /usr/lib/libc.so.6
> 14 0x00007c8185c4e504 in clone () at /usr/lib/libc.so.6
>
> Fixes: 2ce6cff94d ("virtio-pci: fix use of a released vector")
> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
> Signed-off-by: Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com>
> ---
>  hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
> index 592fdaa10f..dc31a37ec0 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
> @@ -860,6 +860,9 @@ static int virtio_pci_get_notifier(VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy, 
> int queue_no,
>      VirtIODevice *vdev = virtio_bus_get_device(&proxy->bus);
>      VirtQueue *vq;
>
> +    if (!proxy->vector_irqfd && vdev->status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK)
> +        return -1;
> +

Did this mean !proxy->vector_irqfd && !(vdev->status &
VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK)) is legal?

Thanks

>      if (queue_no == VIRTIO_CONFIG_IRQ_IDX) {
>          *n = virtio_config_get_guest_notifier(vdev);
>          *vector = vdev->config_vector;
> --
> 2.45.0
>