|
From: | Cédric Le Goater |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH v6 4/9] vfio/{iommufd,container}: Invoke HostIOMMUDevice::realize() during attach_device() |
Date: | Tue, 23 Jul 2024 10:08:10 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird |
On 7/23/24 10:05, Joao Martins wrote:
On 23/07/2024 08:55, Eric Auger wrote:On 7/23/24 09:44, Cédric Le Goater wrote:On 7/23/24 09:38, Eric Auger wrote:Hi Joao, On 7/22/24 23:13, Joao Martins wrote:Move the HostIOMMUDevice::realize() to be invoked during the attach of the device before we allocate IOMMUFD hardware pagetable objects (HWPT). This allows the use of the hw_caps obtained by IOMMU_GET_HW_INFO that essentially tell if the IOMMU behind the device supports dirty tracking. Note: The HostIOMMUDevice data from legacy backend is static and doesn't need any information from the (type1-iommu) backend to be initialized. In contrast however, the IOMMUFD HostIOMMUDevice data requires the iommufd FD to be connected and having a devid to be able to successfullyNit: maybe this comment shall be also added in iommufd.c before the call to vfio_device_hiod_realize() to avoid someone else to move that call earlier at some pointGET_HW_INFO. This means vfio_device_hiod_realize() is called in different places within the backend .attach_device() implementation. Suggested-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.cm> Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com> --- include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h | 1 + hw/vfio/common.c | 16 ++++++---------- hw/vfio/container.c | 4 ++++ hw/vfio/helpers.c | 11 +++++++++++ hw/vfio/iommufd.c | 4 ++++ 5 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h b/include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h index 1a96678f8c38..4e44b26d3c45 100644 --- a/include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h +++ b/include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h @@ -242,6 +242,7 @@ void vfio_region_finalize(VFIORegion *region); void vfio_reset_handler(void *opaque); struct vfio_device_info *vfio_get_device_info(int fd); bool vfio_device_is_mdev(VFIODevice *vbasedev); +bool vfio_device_hiod_realize(VFIODevice *vbasedev, Error **errp); bool vfio_attach_device(char *name, VFIODevice *vbasedev, AddressSpace *as, Error **errp); void vfio_detach_device(VFIODevice *vbasedev); diff --git a/hw/vfio/common.c b/hw/vfio/common.c index 784e266e6aab..da12cbd56408 100644 --- a/hw/vfio/common.c +++ b/hw/vfio/common.c @@ -1537,7 +1537,7 @@ bool vfio_attach_device(char *name, VFIODevice *vbasedev, { const VFIOIOMMUClass *ops =VFIO_IOMMU_CLASS(object_class_by_name(TYPE_VFIO_IOMMU_LEGACY));- HostIOMMUDevice *hiod; + HostIOMMUDevice *hiod = NULL; if (vbasedev->iommufd) { ops = VFIO_IOMMU_CLASS(object_class_by_name(TYPE_VFIO_IOMMU_IOMMUFD)); @@ -1545,21 +1545,17 @@ bool vfio_attach_device(char *name, VFIODevice *vbasedev, assert(ops); - if (!ops->attach_device(name, vbasedev, as, errp)) { - return false; - } - if (vbasedev->mdev) { - return true; + if (!vbasedev->mdev) { + hiod = HOST_IOMMU_DEVICE(object_new(ops->hiod_typename)); + vbasedev->hiod = hiod; } - hiod = HOST_IOMMU_DEVICE(object_new(ops->hiod_typename)); - if (!HOST_IOMMU_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(hiod)->realize(hiod, vbasedev, errp)) { + if (!ops->attach_device(name, vbasedev, as, errp)) { object_unref(hiod); - ops->detach_device(vbasedev); + vbasedev->hiod = NULL; return false; } - vbasedev->hiod = hiod; return true; } diff --git a/hw/vfio/container.c b/hw/vfio/container.c index 10cb4b4320ac..9ccdb639ac84 100644 --- a/hw/vfio/container.c +++ b/hw/vfio/container.c @@ -914,6 +914,10 @@ static bool vfio_legacy_attach_device(const char *name, VFIODevice *vbasedev, trace_vfio_attach_device(vbasedev->name, groupid); + if (!vfio_device_hiod_realize(vbasedev, errp)) { + return false;don't you want to go to err_alloc_ioas instead?hmm, the err_alloc_ioas label is in a different function iommufd_cdev_attach(). may be you meant the comment for routine iommufd_cdev_attach() and label err_connect_bind ? Thanks, C.+ } + group = vfio_get_group(groupid, as, errp); if (!group) { return false; diff --git a/hw/vfio/helpers.c b/hw/vfio/helpers.c index 7e23e9080c9d..ea15c79db0a3 100644 --- a/hw/vfio/helpers.c +++ b/hw/vfio/helpers.c @@ -689,3 +689,14 @@ bool vfio_device_is_mdev(VFIODevice *vbasedev) subsys = realpath(tmp, NULL); return subsys && (strcmp(subsys, "/sys/bus/mdev") == 0); } + +bool vfio_device_hiod_realize(VFIODevice *vbasedev, Error **errp) +{ + HostIOMMUDevice *hiod = vbasedev->hiod; + + if (!hiod) { + return true; + } + + return HOST_IOMMU_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(hiod)->realize(hiod, vbasedev, errp); +} diff --git a/hw/vfio/iommufd.c b/hw/vfio/iommufd.c index 5e2fc1ce089d..2324bf892c56 100644 --- a/hw/vfio/iommufd.c +++ b/hw/vfio/iommufd.c @@ -403,6 +403,10 @@ static bool iommufd_cdev_attach(const char *name, VFIODevice *vbasedev, space = vfio_get_address_space(as); + if (!vfio_device_hiod_realize(vbasedev, errp)) { + return false;Hum sorry my previous comment was targetting that place. I think unrolling is needed up to put_address_space so effectively this does not match err_alloc_ioas but I guess we would need another labelYou're right. We haven't yet attached rthe device and that's what err_alloc_ioas would do. Adding another label not sure would make things cleaner given the ordering requirement. So maybe this instead? @@ -482,7 +483,8 @@ static bool iommufd_cdev_attach(const char *name, VFIODevice *vbasedev, space = vfio_get_address_space(as); if (!vfio_device_hiod_realize(vbasedev, errp)) { - return false; + vfio_put_address_space(space); + goto err_connect_bind; } /* try to attach to an existing container in this space */
LGTM. Thanks, C.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |